Results 1 to 20 of 31
Thread: Seneca Falls Star Lathe
04-11-2009, 10:06 PM #1
Seneca Falls Star Lathe
Just came home with another 'new' lathe. Does anyone have any catalogs or manuals available to scan or copy? Seneca Falls Star. Looks to be a 12" x 48"
No. 40 cast in bed. Last Patent date 1910. Any help would be appreciated. Serial # 110551 Thank you.
Last edited by cretedog; 04-12-2009 at 03:59 PM. Reason: Add Serial #
GP15-1 liked this post
04-12-2009, 12:22 AM #2
There is a catalog download available at OWWM.com, though I think it might be older than your machine.
I had a very similar lathe, just a bit older (three step cone, no back gear guards).
07-03-2009, 09:59 AM #3
Cretedog, saw your message for info on your Star.I have the exact same lathe but the 10in Model.Im can see your lathe has the gear bracket that fits on the lead screw and holds the gears between the lead and stud shaft.could you possibly send a pic or dimension to -email@example.com. The tony lathe site has a lot of info on the Star as well as other lathes.Thank you, George
07-05-2009, 09:14 AM #4
That brings back some good memories, as my first lathe was a Star. I spent many happy hours using it, and it did much good work, despite its antiquity. I can't help with any information, but thanks for posting the photo.
04-21-2012, 03:27 PM #5
04-21-2012, 03:31 PM #6
04-22-2012, 07:39 PM #7
I think you'll really like it. A lot of people scoff at these older lightweight lathes, but they are reasonably accurate, many accessories are available since so many were made. Easy to maintain and easy to adapt accessories to. Mine made hundreds of parts for my Triumph race bikes over the years. Wish I hadn't sold it.
04-22-2012, 09:56 PM #8
I like your paint job it looks great. Mind telling us how you did it? Did you fill, sand, prime and then spray? What brand? In the pictures it looks a lot like Jappan as used on old tools and machinery.
04-23-2012, 09:45 PM #9
Van Sickle Tractor, Equipment & Industrial Enamel, Bret. From the local farm store. Sprayed with the hardener and Naptha as reducer. Not auto paint, but very reasonably priced and, I hope, will be OK in this application.
Lots of scraping and wire brushing, sandblasted a few pieces. Filled, sanded, primed, sanded,... most of it. Had the able help of a great young man in my shop.
Seneca Falls Star No 40 pictures by cretedog - Photobucket
04-23-2012, 11:58 PM #10
My impression is that the Seneca Falls Star was the most popular engine lathe that has survived from the early 20th century, by far. I wonder why ? Nothing special about them....maybe they were the least expensive for their capacity and just sold the most ? Or maybe they advertised the most ? I remember my parents in the 1980's had some wallpaper in a bathroom that was a reproduction of a general old 1900 or so catalog and even that had an ad for Seneca lathes !
04-24-2012, 10:33 AM #11
@Crete- nice work!
@milacon-seeing those add while you were "concetrating" definitely had an influence on you.
04-24-2012, 12:17 PM #12
They probably just made a million of them! That's why there's so many remaining.
My 'work in progress:'
04-24-2012, 09:42 PM #13
Nice little lathe Jim. Looks to be in great shape. Pic of the tailstock is also of my first project to be when I get it belted up. My tailstock has an empty hole where your nice ornate cap or plug resides.
04-25-2012, 11:57 AM #14
I have to confess here, when I purchased that machine, it too had an empty hole on the tailstock.
The lube dauber that's in there, in the photo - the design is made up from whole cloth. I just
turned it up one day when I was bored.
I think it was the first project I did, after I made my over-the-top ball turner.
04-25-2012, 12:09 PM #15
04-26-2012, 09:07 PM #16
Somebody else, what?
I think that seneca falls machines are out there as much as they are - and honestly not
as common as, say, southbend - simply because they were for the most part, not used
in heavy production. Not used up and trashed out, simply because many of them really
were sold with the treadle attachments.
Tough to wear one out that way.
Even those that were electrified, most were used for very light work as they really
weren't suited for much else. It's a real lightweight of a machine.
For example, the machine shown above was covered in a good coat of oily sawdust when
I bought it. But under the mess was a totally unworn bed. The butterfly frosting was still
04-26-2012, 09:25 PM #17
*Monarch 10ee's in the Kennametal plant near Spartanburg, SC had handwheels that looked like they were chrome plated...this due to all the carbide dust from turning carbide !
04-27-2012, 12:22 PM #18
It's really not clear they were that much more successful than other contemporary brands.
Southbend really stands out I guess. Atlas made a lot of machines and probably put more into production work
than seneca falls ever did. Of the older firms, what - hardinge was another big seller with their cataract brand.
It is oddly true though that, while I've often seen several of one kind of machine in an old shop, chances are when
I come across machine tools one at a time, it's often seneca falls. It may be the "star" brand - they put the brand
on all their machine tools so even though they made probably five different sizes and models of machines over the
years, they're all lumped into the "star" brand during discussions.
They have a lot of cool features, that possibly make them more prone to being saved.
A bit of a mystery indeed.
04-27-2012, 12:49 PM #19
I'd have to look back in some of my turn of the century magazines but I don't think South Bend was much of a factor back in the heyday of Seneca Falls lathes. My impression is that although South Bend might have been in business as early as 1905, they didn't come on strong until the 1930's and Atlas after WWII. There were other brands of similar ilk to the Seneca Falls Star back about 1905, but names escape me at the moment.
04-27-2012, 04:02 PM #20
Funny, I would have said the market was about split between Barnes and Seneca Falls. But maybe I'm looking only at the treadle lathe market? Ed Hobbs should be able to comment further on that.
A general impression I might have is that while Seneca Falls offered a treadle lathe, they also offered "regular" lathes to a greater degree than Barnes. Certainly one can say that a Seneca Falls lathe has a little more umph than the rather lightly made Barnes.
Barnes did attempt to sell to the agricultural non-industrial crowd though. The anomoly that Barnes Lathes are ALWAYS found in a chicken coop has some basis in fact. Their lathes were designed to be knocked down and shipped in two (or three?) boxes by railway. Not sure of this for Seneca Falls.