Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In today's age of Cad/Cam where virtually every print we get nowadays is a digital file, can someone tell me the purpose of drawing/designing a part that is NOT to scale?
I imagine parts will always be designed to scale. Drawing to scale is another matter. As a CAD guy and detailer, drawing to another scale had many reasons and still do today. Usually it was to fit large parts on a small sheet of paper, relatively. Drawing a large injection mold and having it fit on a "D" sized sheet. Today, there will always be a need to blow up small detail so it can understood. I do find people getting really sloppy nowadays.
Paul
The only reason for not drawing to scale (other than not having the ability to do so) is when certain features need to be exaggerated. An example would be something like a 4" x 1" x 6' bar where all of the machine work was near the ends. The bar would be drawn with the center part missing so the detail at the ends could be clearly shown. The 6' dimension would be shown from end to end and the drawing marked "Not to Scale".
I get that, but I'm mainly referring to the cad files that the customer sends me to machine his parts from.
Solid models, 2D wireframe, etc.. every single one of them are either 1/2 scale or 1/4 scale. It's so irritating. And these aren't big parts by any means.
You ain't seen nothing until you see one of the old Boeing dash number drawings on paper.
There was a generic drawing of the part with all dimensions as A, B, C, D, etc.
Off to the side is a chart showing the various part versions as dash numbers, like XXX-1, -2 and so on for the different size fittings and O-rings with the values for the A, B, C dimensions. At first glance you can't tell if the -2 part is long and skinny or short and stubby. Depending on dash number it might fit in the palm of your hand or be huge. You study the chart to see what the overall dimension of your part needs to be, but to be sure basically you have to re-draw the part to see if it even fits your machine capabilities. And, you check the revisions to see what those are about.
.
You ain't seen nothing until you see one of the old Boeing dash number drawings on paper.
There was a generic drawing of the part with all dimensions as A, B, C, D, etc.
Off to the side is a chart showing the various part versions as dash numbers, like XXX-1, -2 and so on for the different size fittings and O-rings with the values for the A, B, C dimensions. At first glance you can't tell if the -2 part is long and skinny or short and stubby. .
I get that, but I'm mainly referring to the cad files that the customer sends me to machine his parts from.
Solid models, 2D wireframe, etc.. every single one of them are either 1/2 scale or 1/4 scale. It's so irritating. And these aren't big parts by any means.
You ain't seen nothing until you see one of the old Boeing dash number drawings on paper.
One I remember well was for an installation tool to stretch O-rings over hydraulic fittings without danger of damage from the sharp threads.. The drawing was originally done in the 1940's with dozens of revisions over the years.
There was a generic drawing of the part with all dimensions as A, B, C, D, etc.
Off to the side is a chart showing the various part versions as dash numbers, like XXX-1, -2 and so on for the different size fittings and O-rings with the values for the A, B, C dimensions. At first glance you can't tell if the -2 part is long and skinny or short and stubby. Depending on dash number it might fit in the palm of your hand or be huge. You study the chart to see what the overall dimension of your part needs to be, but to be sure basically you have to re-draw the part to see if it even fits your machine capabilities. And, you check the revisions to see what those are about.
I know Boeing has quite a crew of contract workers going through these old drawings putting them on Catia. In itself that's not an easy thing to do. My neighbor did that for years.
If it is a customer that you Want to work with, try and train them to give you the info the way you want it.
I'm not sure I am understanding the problem. If you are being sent a CAD file, surely any scale you want is but one or two mouse clicks away? And doesn't your CAD system give you correct dimensions no matter what the scale? You can't hold a ruler up to the screen to get accurate dimensions in any case....
If this is the biggest problem in your day, you have an easy life!
Notice
This website or its third-party tools process personal data (e.g. browsing data or IP addresses) and use cookies or other identifiers, which are necessary for its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy. To learn more, please refer to the cookie policy. In case of sale of your personal information, you may opt out by sending us an email via our Contact Us page. To find out more about the categories of personal information collected and the purposes for which such information will be used, please refer to our privacy policy. You accept the use of cookies or other identifiers by closing or dismissing this notice, by scrolling this page, by clicking a link or button or by continuing to browse otherwise.