Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Rich L is offline Cast Iron
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    252

    Default threading tool Z offset question

    I tried to find this in forum history but no joy and the books I have don't say ... probably a dumb question ...

    My question is this: what is the convention, if there is one, for setting the Z offset for a single point threading tool be it indexable or solid? Is the Z offset set to the end of the tool or to the actual threading point. If it's set to the point, how is that accomplished?

    I've been successfully threading using the tool end to set the Z offset but depending on the size of the tool, especially the solid type, I have to compensate in the program the Z end point for the length of thread by at least 1/2 pitch. In other words if I want a .500 length of thread from zero I have to command the tool to go to -.500 plus some (that would be negative "plus") to get the threading point to .500

    I have no problem dealing with the "plus some" but what is the practice out there with the offsets?

    I know I still need to know the full length of the tool so I don't run into anything.

    Hope my question is clear - no biggee, just curious.

    (Fanuc 0i TB gang tool lathe)

    Cheers,
    Rich

  2. #2
    Nmbmxer is offline Cast Iron
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Roanoke, VA
    Posts
    272

    Default

    I use the side of the insert for z-zero, or whatever would crash into a shoulder. I mostly use top-lock inserts, where the tip is located at 1/2 the width. If I need a certain length of thread I add 1/2 width to the depth and check it with a ring gauge, I find this easier to remember than to subtract some from the z depth when threading close to a shoulder.

  3. #3
    gcodeguy is offline Cast Iron
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Easton, PA
    Posts
    468

    Default

    We always program from the side of the insert. Programs need to be modified if not threading into an under-cut, and our guesses aren't close enough. No big deal. I do program for a family of lathes that require a bit more trouble if the thread has to go close to a shoulder. I have to go to a G32 and the last 3-4 passes add an empty block between the end of the thread and the pullout. This keeps the tool at the root diameter until it reaches the final Z-position. Otherwise it pulls out too soon regardless of RPM.

  4. #4
    racen857's Avatar
    racen857 is offline Hot Rolled
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    pennsylviana, usa
    Posts
    519

    Default

    Same here set to the edge of the tool and add the amount from the edge to the point. After all you only have to alter your program once. Then you are not crashing your machine because somebody forgets to account for the difference later.

  5. #5
    Rich L is offline Cast Iron
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    252

    Default

    Thanks again, folks.

    Sounds like the vote so far is to offset to the end (edge) of the tool and compensate for the desired point position within the program.

    Cheers,
    Rich

  6. #6
    Cuda is offline Cast Iron
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    411

    Default

    I ALWAYS use the end too, I often have to thread up to within .03 of a shoulder on some small parts and this way it never crashes.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •