Bill, have you gone through the exercise of bluing in your collection? And then using plastigage to check those that had questionable readings? The D1-3 fit is a bitch to get right. The way I understand the correct fit, the flat on the back of the spindle tooling should make contact at the point where the taper locks. A well fitted chuck will not fall off the spindle when the cam locks are released, it takes a hit with your hand to loosen the chuck.
I posted an article on the Monarch forum at least a decade ago about checking and correcting my collection of spindle tooling. You can read the article, but the upshot is that even new tooling often does not fit well, and to correct the fit you may need to machine the flat, or the taper. Every .001" of clearance you have in the taper requires about .008" to be removed from the flat.
Dave
I haven't been that careful - yet.
Read your thread - and others - a few years ago, and the take-away that I have so far been satisfied with IS the need to bump the nose-art to get it to release.
Mind, both 10EE came in the door naked, so the majority of what gets onto the spindle is brand-new now, not used.
All but one faceplate are used, but save for one chuck, where chucks are not new, their backplates are.
I have new camlocks to install in the spindle before - or concurrent with - going into finer-granularity checking of the taper & flat. Spindle will first have come out for new bearings - and the installation of that nice shifter fork, (finally).
Makes sense that should be rolled into one 'project', but I am not to where I am ready to do without the lathe just yet. We are into tachometer feedback test plotting and scheming now.
Good news is that besides the second 10EE, I also have a complete spare spindle, sans forward bearings.
Heavy bugger, but still - there is my sort-of-portable 'master' without having to fab one just for the purpose.