Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 25 of 25
Like Tree12Likes

Thread: workholding help with this v shaped part

  1. #21
    vanguard cycle's Avatar
    vanguard cycle is offline Cast Iron
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Charleston/NYC
    Posts
    464

    Default

    alright guys, update time.
    decided to try one last thing before i welded to these pieces.
    i know this is a dodgy set up but the tolerance was not tight, just a weldment for foot controls on an MC.
    that said there was a fair amount of chatter, presumably from the deflection but it worked perfectly fine all things considered.
    probably a bit tricky to tell from the pics but set up was 1/4" x 2 angle drilled for through bolts and attached to a 30 degree angle plate, pinched in the vise with a piece of ash against the fixed jaw and an aluminum soft jaw on the sliding jaw.
    went nice and slow with counter bore operation and flipped 180 for facing on other side with a brand new 3/8 4 flute. Looks good, nice and level and a n almost perfect fit. starting finish welding now so will update here later in the week with finished pics as well.

    as a side note this is my first post from inside the shop with a desktop on the shop desk, having internet access in the shop is amazing!

    thanks again guys
    img517.jpgimg516.jpg

  2. #22
    S_W_Bausch is offline Diamond
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
    Posts
    4,598

    Default

    I stuggled for several minutes considering this a "fixturing for vertical mill" challenge.


    Those suggesting this is a "fixturing for lathe" situation seem to be on the right path.

    Perhaps a faceplate with split bore clamp/collet/endmill holder, etc. mounted on the faceplate, or clamped in a chuck. The chuck stays clamped tight to the fixture, it's the fixture that clamps/releases the workpiece.

    What is the specified tolerance? Any issues/concerns with minor cosmetic flaws, such as setscrew marks?

    I can easily see the fixturing costs exceeding the actual operations costs.

    Good Luck,
    Steve

  3. #23
    vanguard cycle's Avatar
    vanguard cycle is offline Cast Iron
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Charleston/NYC
    Posts
    464

    Default

    your absolutely right Steve, the fixturing and setting up on this one easily outweighed any profits.
    its done though and well within tolerance so i guess i will consider it another valuable workholding lesson learned. In the future i would love to take this kind of thing to the leblond but i REALLY need to invest in goodies as i'm more or less limited to 3 or 4 jaw currently.

  4. #24
    Kevin Barrett is offline Aluminum
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Alberta,Canada
    Posts
    52

    Default

    I would also agree with Limey and ask why not the 3 jaw on the lathe?It certainly looks as if the jaws could easily clamp onto
    the short stub without an issue It would have to be not too large a 3 jaw ,but doable,,,,,,,i guess everyone 's an expert on the
    internet.

    Maybe the vise in the mill could also work,are the short cylinders not 2 points on a line? if you catch my drift.I know you said it moved,but
    at first you asked for advice about fixturing for the drill and c'bore operation,but then you show a fixture for holding the part after the drilling and counterbore?,,,,,,did I lose the plot? which one are you finding most difficult?

  5. #25
    jkilroy is online now Diamond
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Vicksburg, MS
    Posts
    4,751

    Default

    You said the drilling was ok, I'd use the bolt holes to bolt the unit to a fixture plate and then clamp the plate in a vise.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •