viper
Titanium
- Joined
- May 18, 2007
- Location
- nowhereville
Now, I am just a person that love a high energy, quiet rifle. It rather torques me that most stated prohibit suppressors for hunting because it "may be unsafe for hunting area personel". Biggest line I have ever heard. Suppression saves hearing, reducing noise annoyance, does not spoil everyones party when you pull the trigger, etc.
I get really irritated that suppressors get such a bad rap like they are like having a full auto (they ARE in the same class level) which just is not the case. It has been proven that you can illegalize anything and it will still get in the hands of criminals. that being said, I don't know of many drive bys where suppressors are used. Thugs are much tooooo stupid to use them. Suppressors can be bulky, heavy, and don't make for a "silent" shot, just quieter than unsuppressed.
thoughts? I have to wonder what the future holds. Obviously if the whole US bands together on an issue, that is the only way things get done anymore.
I get really irritated that suppressors get such a bad rap like they are like having a full auto (they ARE in the same class level) which just is not the case. It has been proven that you can illegalize anything and it will still get in the hands of criminals. that being said, I don't know of many drive bys where suppressors are used. Thugs are much tooooo stupid to use them. Suppressors can be bulky, heavy, and don't make for a "silent" shot, just quieter than unsuppressed.
thoughts? I have to wonder what the future holds. Obviously if the whole US bands together on an issue, that is the only way things get done anymore.