Steelphil
Aluminum
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2013
- Location
- Minneapolis MN
I am wondering if someone can shed some light on an issue I seem to be having with one of our fairly new Haas VF3ss (1 year old)
We have 2 identical VF3ss machines, purchased about 6 months apart, and I have noticed some inconsistencies with the repeatability of the “older machine” as compared to the repeatability of the newer one.
The issue has shown itself during machining of a small part requiring features held within .001 concentricity to a previously ground bearing journal. On the “newer machine” this has not been an issue at all, I can hold .0003 fairly easily by sweeping in the journal and adjusting my offset accordingly. Typically The offset will stay consistent and I will continue to maintain my tolerance with little issue.
However this current run of parts was to be run in the “older machine” using the same fixture, I could not get the machine to hold the location tolerance at all. I went through my whole setup and ran a few tests to eliminate my fixturing as the issue.
To prove that the issue was independent of any of my setup, I indicated the journal within .0002, set my work offset to that indication, and set the z offset to cut above the part 1.0 inches. After running the program which did not cut the part at all, and moving the machine back to the initial work zero, the offset had drifted by .0009
I eventually gave up fussing with the machine and moved the fixture to the new machine and without changing anything in my program, or setup I ran the next part within .0003 with no issue
Is .0009 inch considered within the machines expected repeatability?
I spoke with my HFO this morning and a tech instructed me to place an indicator on the table and touch the spindle, while pulling along the x and y axis.. there was no dead spot or backlash, which lead him to believe the machine has twisted.
Other than sweeping the table, is there anything I can do to make sure that is the issue before I have them come out to re-level it?
We have 2 identical VF3ss machines, purchased about 6 months apart, and I have noticed some inconsistencies with the repeatability of the “older machine” as compared to the repeatability of the newer one.
The issue has shown itself during machining of a small part requiring features held within .001 concentricity to a previously ground bearing journal. On the “newer machine” this has not been an issue at all, I can hold .0003 fairly easily by sweeping in the journal and adjusting my offset accordingly. Typically The offset will stay consistent and I will continue to maintain my tolerance with little issue.
However this current run of parts was to be run in the “older machine” using the same fixture, I could not get the machine to hold the location tolerance at all. I went through my whole setup and ran a few tests to eliminate my fixturing as the issue.
To prove that the issue was independent of any of my setup, I indicated the journal within .0002, set my work offset to that indication, and set the z offset to cut above the part 1.0 inches. After running the program which did not cut the part at all, and moving the machine back to the initial work zero, the offset had drifted by .0009
I eventually gave up fussing with the machine and moved the fixture to the new machine and without changing anything in my program, or setup I ran the next part within .0003 with no issue
Is .0009 inch considered within the machines expected repeatability?
I spoke with my HFO this morning and a tech instructed me to place an indicator on the table and touch the spindle, while pulling along the x and y axis.. there was no dead spot or backlash, which lead him to believe the machine has twisted.
Other than sweeping the table, is there anything I can do to make sure that is the issue before I have them come out to re-level it?