Results 141 to 160 of 482
Thread: USA & Global Heating
08-09-2015, 06:02 AM #141
The Snowball Earth hypothesis describes a sceneriao that might have happened prior to 650 million years ago.
Just guessing but no whales there for certain- even fish?
Pretty much too early to be a example of the regulatory regime of climate as it relates to us and all of our forbears..
Life on the planet for ~4 BILLION years WOW....
I imagine God coming back from a coffee break..
"What the hell have you prokaryotes been doing? I wanted multi cellularity by now.."
Bit later he comes back from lunch..
"You clams are swimming?? and why all those crazy arms? I got fish for this- get back in your shells and back on the bottom where I put you"
He hates to do it but has to step out for a piss...
"HUMANS? Who made these damn things and if you think I am going to clean up after your mess...."
08-09-2015, 09:15 AM #142
Then there's this interesting take on the subject........
08-09-2015, 12:52 PM #143
08-09-2015, 01:25 PM #144
- Water is essential to life
- Farmers purposely add water to crops to make them grow
- When there's water, the plants are green
- We actually search for water on other planets as a sign they can support life
- Water shouldn't be confused with the explosive hydrogen (the H2 in H2O)-- like CO and CO2 it has some extra oxygen atoms.
- And so on.
Here's the counterpoint (video part way down the page): http://www.skepticalscience.com/empi...use-effect.htm
The important point, IMO, is that one doesn't have to agree with either video or believe that lighting ten billion fires* across the planet has the slightest effect on the atmosphere, temperature, climate, storms, drought, sea levels, arctic ice, polar bears etc. to want to use a few more alternatives. That switch is entirely justified on the half dozen other grounds (pollution, health, level playing fields, defense, etc.) noted above.
*Just this morning I lit a half dozen or so fires. Lit one to take a warm shower. The huge one was to power my car. A little one, my share way back in a power plant, made my coffee and breakfast. Another one is powering my browser (and the 'nets massive data centers). Others are powering lights. Pretty soon I'll "light" several fairly big ones in my shop. I've been procrastinating on starting the ones labeled Stihl (downed tree) and Husqvarna (weeds that need trimming to keep fire clearance).
Having the energy available to power these things is terrific. But, but the sources of that energy don't have to come 80+% from digging up our trove of fossil fuels and burning them all as soon as possible. Especially since some of the alternatives, when true costs are considered, are cheaper and more sustainably abundant.
08-09-2015, 01:56 PM #145
He was OK when he started Greenpeace, but since he left them.........Not so much?
08-09-2015, 02:00 PM #146
08-09-2015, 02:02 PM #147
A quick check on the guy (fired up my browser) would show that it's a stretch of the truth to say he founded Greenpeace. Overall, he sounds like an OK guy to me; much like the dozens in the other video clip that disagree with him.
But if you understand my point, even if the tiny fraction of climate scientists thinking that humans aren't contributing to climate instability are correct -- we'd still want to encourage alternatives for all the other reasons noted above.
08-09-2015, 04:23 PM #148
Who Founded Greenpeace? Not Patrick Moore. ? Greg Laden's Blog
For the last 30 yrs Moore has been a stooge mouthpiece available to push any sort of "science" so long as someone's willing to pay him for what he says.
08-09-2015, 05:01 PM #149
Greenpeace, like so many other similar "causes" probably started off with the best intentions until "the chosen few" found out that they it paid well. After that it was all about money and the input from "useful idiots" aka members.
michiganbuck liked this post
08-09-2015, 05:14 PM #150
I think the world gets so hot naturally then we will have another Ice Age.
How am I going auger through 60 feet of ice to go fishing, that is the question.
Trboatworks liked this post
08-09-2015, 05:45 PM #151
08-09-2015, 06:33 PM #152
Im with carbide bob, so long as the changes happen over the 5-10 year per foot + range, its a non issue, Most docks - sea ports need dredging at at least that frequency, most docks and there cranage rarely make it over 20 years of age these days. Hell felisxtowe docks here in suffolk has had significant changes probably at least every 3-4 years just to keep up with ever increasing boat size.
Way too many humans seam hell bent against change. The worlds not a stable place, you build a house in a flood plane, chances are your going to get wet feat once in a while. Its taught in school here to 8 year olds, its not rocket science, its the basic skills mankind need to survive. Sure you want to live on the flood plane, back onto the nice little stream go for it, just don't expect me to fund your life choices especially the bad ones. Same as having a fully landscaped garden in a arid area prone to bush fires, yeah if you have trees that go right upto your property + a roof made out of something flammable its probably going to catch fire when the blazes come through. Alternative garden choices and building materials are available! They just might not match the latest fashion choice! As is living some were not so inhospitable!!
Floods, Ice ages, Droughts, wild fires , meteor Strikes etc have all happened and will all continue to happen, Whats made us top of the food chain is not a stupid one off idea - approach but the flexibility to adjust to a changing world around us. The idea of a fixed steady state is one of the few things we know for certain as a pipe dream, the worlds just not a stable place, we had to adapt to get this far, its kinda short sighted to expect not to have to adapt again.
As to relocating cities, Pretty much everything in the Americas was not there 300 years ago. Kinda hard to imagine that if the bankers in NYC were getting wet feet they would not simply find a solution weather moving or just better flood defences!!
08-09-2015, 06:47 PM #153
I think calling a foot every five to ten years a "non-issue" is understating it a bit..
The Gulf Stream is sort of handy for you Brits- another non-issue?
Exceptional twentieth-century slowdown in Atlantic Ocean overturning circulation : Nature Climate Change
08-09-2015, 07:54 PM #154
By definition, the world has been warming for the last 12,000 years.
If that were not true, we would still be in the last ice age.
Ice ages have occurred repeatedly for at least the last 2.6 Million years*.
So the warmer periods between ice ages were caused by ... GLOBAL WARMING.
It's a natural cycle on the planet.
*Per NOAA's National Climatic Data Center: Climate Timeline Tool: Summary of 100,000 Years
08-09-2015, 08:21 PM #155
08-09-2015, 08:30 PM #156
There probably isn't a carrot near big enough to account for $2 trillion and thousands of lives spent defending oil, thousands of pollution related deaths, billions lost in oil spills . . .
08-09-2015, 08:41 PM #157
08-09-2015, 08:42 PM #158
08-09-2015, 08:56 PM #159
What's NOT natural is the concentration of PR firms blasting away in the media trying to scare the public.
The more they scare the uninformed masses, the more money the masses happily throw at their "saviors".
This whole nonsense is 110% about enriching a few companies.
08-09-2015, 09:01 PM #160
Europe is going to be cold as Hades. Or so I think.
What is the rest of the world going to do with all the heat that didn't make it to Norway? Who knows, but I don't want to be living in the Bahamas when that happens. ;-)
Don't worry, I'm not holding my breath.........