South Bend 9 inexpensive collets: half solved spindle puzzle and a question...
Largest Manufacturing Technology
Community On The Web
Close
Login to Your Account

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Country
    UNITED KINGDOM
    Posts
    3
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default South Bend 9 inexpensive collets: half solved spindle puzzle and a question...

    OK,
    in the desperate search for a cost effective, simple solution to getting "collet" and "South Bend 9 C" in the same sentence I have stumbled across these 2 solutions, both based on ER32 collets which are now very inexpensive:
    - Search for "100MM DIAMETER ER-32 COLLET CHUCK " on eBay and you find a backplate mounting chuck. So for under $100 / £100 you get one of these and a backplate, some simple fitting and you are done. Much neater and less expensive than one of those big chucks with the integral draw system;
    - Searching for the SB9 spindle taper, I have discovered that it's almost certainly a Morse B24 taper, the same taper angle as MT3 but one "size" bigger, as if it continued from the larger end of the MT3. Check it on Wikipedia. These are used for arbors, like a Jacobs taper.

    So, if I could find a B24 - MT2 / Mt3 sleeve I could get a simple, inexpensive, widely available MT2/3 - ER32 collet system... But they don't seem to exist, only arbors, sigh...

    BUT, if the B24 is just 2 mm larger in diameter than MT3 why not turn a sleeve? Painful to set up the taper of course...
    BUT (my quest for a quick fix continues) what about a sheet of 1mm steel sheet wrapped round an MT3 taper (trimmed to a truncated cone of course), that would take it dimensionally up to a B24?

    I don't have any MT3 tools, I need to buy sleeve and give it a try...

    Meanwhile, reactions? Improvements?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Country
    UNITED STATES
    State/Province
    California
    Posts
    5,111
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    1062
    Likes (Received)
    979

    Default

    Yes, turning a sleeve is a good solution.

    Halcohead did just that and made a sleeve to go from 6R->5C on his Rivett 1030F. AFAIK, he uses it all the time.

    6R to 5C Spindle Conversion

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Country
    UNITED STATES
    State/Province
    Virginia
    Posts
    6,350
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    2782
    Likes (Received)
    3016

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by atreder View Post
    OK,
    in the desperate search for a cost effective, simple solution to getting "collet" and "South Bend 9 C" in the same sentence
    .
    .
    BUT (my quest for a quick fix continues) what about a sheet of 1mm steel sheet wrapped round an MT3 taper (trimmed to a truncated cone of course), that would take it dimensionally up to a B24?

    I don't have any MT3 tools, I need to buy sleeve and give it a try...

    Meanwhile, reactions? Improvements?
    First off . .JF FORGET the s**t-sheet shim! Taper is nowhere near "painful" if you have a lathe.

    My first few had to be done with files on a Walker-Turner Drillpress to get the LSO (and the DP) into more useful order.

    Secondly.. ER is not the only "nose mount" out there, and nose-mounts can carry collets waay larger than the spindle bore. bar-stock is still limited to bore. Pre-sawed slugs or repair work not so much.

    Downside is greater hang-out, using up a ration of longitudinal c-to-c daylight as well.

    ISTR the "native" SB 9" is a 3C? Even so, you might be better-served with a 5C key-cranker. Lot easier to find internal expanding, hex, and square, collets than for ER system.

    Disclosure: I have 5C, 5C step, 2J, ER40, ER20, Rubber-Flex 9XX, and Multisize. D1-3 mount. "Nose actuated", loop/lever, handwheel, key, or wrench closers, every one of them - no drawtubes atall.

    YOUR "first one" should be either 3C, (or wotever..) and ignorant handwheel drawtube like most other SB 9, ELSE 5C, nose-cranker.

    ER 32 means the shortest slug it wants to hold well needs to be 32 mm long in collet, and not much less. They were meant for TOOL SHANK holding, after all. Not workpiece holding.

  4. Likes Blob, JohnEvans liked this post
  5. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Country
    UNITED STATES
    State/Province
    California
    Posts
    5,111
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    1062
    Likes (Received)
    979

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Monarchist View Post
    ER 32 means the shortest slug it wants to hold well needs to be 32 mm long in collet, and not much less. They were meant for TOOL SHANK holding, after all. Not workpiece holding.
    ER sucks on the lathe, IMO, and I use it on my mills, just not on the lathe.

    The 5C is certainly one of the best as it's common. I consider the 6R I use very similar in style to a 5C, but not nearly as easy to find as 5C and very hard to find squares and hexes.

  6. Likes Monarchist liked this post
  7. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Country
    UNITED STATES
    State/Province
    Virginia
    Posts
    6,350
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    2782
    Likes (Received)
    3016

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by traditional-tools View Post
    ER sucks on the lathe, IMO, and I use it on my mills, just not on the lathe.
    I'm set up to use ER 40 or ER 20 EVERYWHERE (their range overlaps. Just barely).

    Lathes, mills, DH, rotab, bench workholding.. Alzmetall AB5/S DP included .. but..
    ...only as a last choice.

    I'm set-up NOWHERE with ER as a "primary" solution.

    CNC shop with toolchanger magazines to fill? Not MY bag, but would surely be t'otherway 'round, and perhaps TG over ER, even so.


Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •