Not entirely sure what you're trying to get at by saying " doing as he was told", but he was told to not proceed with the EU acceptance by his oligarch puppeteer from the east.
Then he was shown the error of his ways by Russia's export embargo in 2012.
That was Russia's doing.
My point was that politicians are corruptible and deceptive creatures. All of them have their hand in the cookie jar. When they are not campaigning, they are trying to figure out what the next guy is doing.
All of this happens yet they are never held accountable. If you see a politician fall from grace, you'd better believe he was pushed by someone.
Perhaps, perhaps not.
That was the US's doing.
So would you agree that Russia had a major ( if not primary ) hand in leading up to the events in 2013, while the US ( and the EU to some extent ) had a hand in the outcome?
Russia was always going to have involvement in Ukraine. I would like to believe that it would not have been 100% grift, greed and exploitation but I do not know nearly enough about the culture or government of either nation to say for sure.
I
do in fact understand the US government and their history of foreign policy. I have seen evidence of our government officials profiting from their positions in the name of aid to Ukraine.
Therefore, I say with confidence that US involvement in Ukraine was never driven by the pure pursuit of humanitarian aid.
This means that the US government did not look at the situation and think;... "
O' Lord, how my heart yearns for the oppressed and abused people of Ukraine. I wish to set them free from the chains that bind them so they too may know the sweet embrace of liberty and righteousness as an unmolested sovereign nation under God.
^^^ This is
exactly how western media and our government wants you to think - and many people are intoxicated by it. This
really gets under my skin because it is a deceitful lie. It distorts judgement and causes people to turn away from knowledge.
If you do agree, then where are we?
You think Russia has the right to go completely unchecked, free to do whatever Vladimir dreams up?
When should the West have the right to pipe up? There was silence after Georgia, you think it should be silence regarding Ukraine as well?
How about after Latvia? Lithuania? Estonia? Moldova?
We are likely having two different conversations. Not every injustice can be resolved by our actions. Quite often a solution to one problem makes others worse.
Look at Afghanistan for instance. The US military goes on a "peace keeping" mission and tries to inject our culture and governance into a land where they still stone women to death for adultery, our presence only makes trouble for the innocent.
The world is a cursed place full of sin and evil. The western world only displays theirs differently. We have no "right" as a nation to do anything to any other nation. Sometimes action is justified... Most of the time it is not. Either way it has nothing to do with rights.
The US government is not a righteous entity, period. They are greedy, evil, manipulative, power hungry, arrogant fools... Just like any other government.
No, I don't think Russia has a "right" to do what they are doing. I also don't think the US government has any business sticking their noses in the matter. The unintended consequences will be suffered by the people of Ukraine while those who cause it sleep soundly on the opposite side of the world.
You share Scott's assertion that Putin has a god given right to ignore and trample the agreements his drunken predecessor made back in 1994 and once again in 1997?
How about if NATO did the same thing and populated every single mile of it's eastern borders with nuclear weapons and fully equipped battle ready battalions?
Rulers have a God ordained duty to promote what is good and punish what is evil. If any leader of a nation cared to humble themselves before God, this is the way they would conduct themselves.
Again, rights do not factor in here. I do not know anything about the agreements you mentioned so I cannot speak to that.