What's new
What's new

Aluminum part for proof of concept

Larry G

Plastic
Joined
Feb 4, 2021
Location
Carlstadt, NJ
We are developing a low-power mechanism to wind up the actuating cable pulling a "web" of thin material.
Think of a window shade without an internal spring. The circumference of the roller with the shade changes continuously.
The circumference of this component varies to match the windup and payout of the shade.
A FUSEE was developed hundreds of years ago, used by clock makers to compensate for the diminishing torque as the mainspring unwound.Screen Capture.jpg
The item is modelled in SolidWorks, any other format is available.
The full radius at the top of the .020" "fin" is not really required, just breaking the edge would be sufficient.
Very small ceramic media in a vibratory finisher would probably suffice.
I'm looking for a quote for onsey-twosy at the moment, as well as suggestions to optimize the manufacturability of the part.

Thanks,

Larry in NJ
 
Last edited:
The garage door cable drums are exactly the same as the clockmaker's application.
Ours uses the same principle but not to compensate for torque, but rather for varying circumference.
Our application puts the fusee and the web roller on the same shaft.
A pair of them are arranged parallel to each other with the web portions forming a closure (pair of window shades meeting at the center).

Is there a tragic flaw in the design that would cause the manufacturing cost to blow up?
Looking for a quote from anyone interested.

Thanks for the link.

Larry
 
If you eventually go to large numbers of these, you will probably want them cast rather than machined, for economy. In that case, you might consider making the retaining flange ("start of track" side) a separate simple piece which fastens to the main part. This would simplify pattern/mold making and drawing the parts from the mold.
 








 
Back
Top