It sort of has taken over.
A engine or transmission plant that in the 70s would have employed a few thousand is now maybe 500 or less.
Automobiles are probably the only thing left in the US with production numbers that big. Even then, why did they shitcan Oldsmobile ? If automation is so cool, why couldn't they keep low numbers of cars sold viable ? Automation is so groovy, they should be able to make three pieces economically.
Now that most of the mass-produced stuff has left the US, the "automation" everyone fears is going to have to do 50 pieces, 30 pieces, 200 pieces, 10 pieces and change over immediately from a honkin' big iron casting to delicate little aluminum parts out of solid, from drilling customized bowling balls to making good crankpins for knuckleheads. All in one day.
yeah right.
(You can't get decent Harley parts these days, nobody wants to make them in the US, "not enough
prooofit in it ... even fucking S&S has stuff made overseas now. So I guess automation hasn't worked out all that well after all, cuz the shops in China making that stuff are
not automated.)
People are cheaper and better at small lot production. If automation does eliminate those jobs, it will be because there weren't enough people.
Tonytn mentioned that the automakers (high volume) have the goal of replacing people. That's because this society is a piece of shit. The people at the top are shitheads and the people buying are shitheads. It's shit, top to bottom. Nobody gives a crap about the world, all they care about is themselves.
Live by the sword, die by the sword.
You know, people are very bad at predicting the future. But looking at the fucking mess we are making of the world that sustains us, it's quite possible that automation is not the future at all. It's quite possible that if the species makes it at all, it'll be something different ...
vermont unautomated