I don´t know where You get Your disinformation from.
Here is a link to natgas prices.
Interactive chart illustrating the history of Henry Hub natural gas prices. The prices shown are in U.S. dollars.
www.macrotrends.net
US natgas traded under 2$ in 2020-
European natural gas futures traded around €36 per megawatt-hour on Wednesday, after rising almost 7% in the previous session as a result of a revision in the details of a planned outage at the Troll natural gas facility by Norwegian gas system operator Gassco. The modification to the outage...
tradingeconomics.com
About 18€ == 20 $ today in the EU.
This is a bit over 10x the price in 2020.
There is inadequate "liquefaction and transportation capacity available at this time" as You said. In the US.
Yes.
This is why the US suppliers are now selling the LNG at 11x the price from 2 years ago.
BECAUSE the silly germans refused to return the compressor for NS1 to st petersburg where it compresses the natgas to deliver proper volumes.
There is simply too little natgas, and in a scarcity market prices skyrocketed.
There is high demand in the EU, because of the NS1 closure and the NS2 not being used, and the smaller pipelines being closed, and the US shipped natgas is the only supplier who can increase volumes significantly.
Norway increased a bit, but their volume is quite limited,
At a very high price == 20$ , partly due to shipping costs but mostly because the US oil majors are making bank and charging as much as they can.
The US extraction cost remain the same -- essentially zero.
The huge recent (7 years) US LNG overflow is mostly a spinoff of US fracking, and was mostly previously thrown away aka flared aka burned, because insufficient US demand made it uneconomical to sell.
The NS2 pipeline is (was) ready, and only needed the germans to turn the valve on.
The NS2 is much bigger than NS1, and would have supplied all the EU with abundant heating and power at a typical historical consumer cost around 9 c/kWh.
*Germany* refused to turn on NS2.
Putin referred to it, saying the EU can have cheap power tomorrow, just use the 10B$ pipeline already built.
With insufficient cheap russian natgas, companies and people have to use electric and oil heating.
Due to historical sharp demand peaks, prices have skyrocketed.
Power generally costs about 3-7 c/kWh in qty, 9 c retail, and reducing due to phase out of expensive nukes and ever more abundant PV (wind).
Today, german prices are upto 1€/kWh, 11x higher.
Spain and finland, typical prices are about 50c/kWh.
6x higher.
Madness.
I am NOT directly blaming the US energy companies. Never did.
They are the keystone supplier, and their mission is to make as much money as they can for their shareholders and CEO.
But the fact is that they are massively profiteering from the NS2 debacle.
A 700B€ EU bill was just approved in energy subsidies.
This essentially goes to the US energy companies.
Madness.
Thats 1000€ per person in a 700 m person economy.
And it will repeat every 6-9 months unless sane heads prevail.
History teaches us that economic scarcity aka "poor" leads to fast drastic changes in government policies.
No-one wants to be cold in the winter, and even a distant great-grandma in another country dying in the cold polarises attitudes.
No-one wants to be poor, but a 1500€ heating bill every 2 months will significantly hurt all EU citizens,
rich and poor.
Discretionary spending will plummet, leading to a huge knock-on effect in macro terms.
I think and expect that within about 3-4-6 months with 2-3 high energy bills and massive job losses, a part of the whole EU popula will turn against the ukraine, blaming them for the economic catastrophe we are all in.
Mostly with reason.
The war is terrible, and a bad idea, and to be regretted.
I am not a Putin fan, I just point out rationale, and facts on the ground.
Likewise, I am never anti-USA, I simply disagree with some decisions their senior politicians make, with global effects.
I apploud the good and sometimes criticise the bad. US/FI/ES/ whatever. And try to explain why.