What's new
What's new

I keep hearing that this winter will be bad for manufacturing in Europe.

Status
Not open for further replies.

SeymourDumore

Diamond
Joined
Aug 2, 2005
Location
CT
Latest is that Russia offer for gas to Germany via Nord Stream 2.

Rejected.....

the US of A has the LPG market sewn up!
Huh? LPG market?

BTW, Russia's offer ( heard bits an pieces, need some more though ) of supply via NS2 is fishy as fuck!
From some of the things I've heard ( and none of this is fact, rather a bit better than rumors ) is that while damage to NS1 is substantial, one of the pipes of the NS2 pair is virtually intact.
So, if the Russian government is kind enough, they could restore a partial flow to Germany and the west.
All they'd have to do is... well, wotever Vladimir Vladimirovics demands.

If any of that is true, one must revisit the question of just who might have damaged the lines in the first place he?
 

Trboatworks

Diamond
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Location
Maryland- USA
OK, I'll bite.
Depleting the strategic oil reserve to historical lows
Student loan forgiveness

The first one is a poor attempt at curbing the effects of inflation, while the other is directly fueling it.
Both at the same time.
You and I WILL be paying for it!!!
Selling crude into the market at high prices buffers the demand base which is influencing those prices.
This act nets the government coffers a profit on reserve purchased at prices during the Obama era, and reduces the cost to consumers as prices adjust to new supply metrics.
 

Freedommachine

Stainless
Joined
May 13, 2020
Oh, I'll fall on that sword.
Humm, where to start...
Here's as good a place as any:


Tr- I am only copying limited text. I am not cherry picking, I just don't want to fill the page with unimportant word salad. I will include section info so you can analyze the source without searching.

sec 4 (a)
"place a temporary moratorium on all activities of the Federal Government relating to the implementation of the Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program"

sec 4 (b)

"Executive Order 13754 and the Presidential Memorandum of December 20, 2016, are hereby reinstated in their original form, thereby restoring the original withdrawal of certain offshore areas in Arctic waters and the Bering Sea from oil and gas drilling."


Edit: not even close to finished yet, posted by accident

Sec. 6. "Revoking the March 2019 Permit for the Keystone XL Pipeline"

Sec. 7 (d)

"the Presidential Memorandum of October 19, 2018 (Promoting the Reliable Supply and Delivery of Water in the West), and the Presidential Memorandum of February 19, 2020 (Developing and Delivering More Water Supplies in California), are hereby revoked."



Next document:


Sec 102
(f)"The United States will also immediately begin to develop a climate finance plan, making strategic use of multilateral and bilateral channels and institutions, to assist developing countries in implementing ambitious emissions reduction measures...and promoting the flow of capital toward climate-aligned investments and away from high-carbon investments"

(h) "The Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of Energy shall work together and with the Export-Import Bank of the United States, the Chief Executive Officer of the DFC, and the heads of other agencies and partners, as appropriate, to identify steps through which the United States can promote ending international financing of carbon-intensive fossil fuel-based energy while simultaneously advancing sustainable development and a green recovery"


^^^huh, wonder what it is we'll need to "recover" from? 🤔


Part 2 Sec 201

"We must listen to science—and act. We must strengthen our clean air and water protections. We must hold polluters accountable for their actions. We must deliver environmental justice in communities all across America. The Federal Government must drive assessment, disclosure, and mitigation of climate pollution and climate-related risks in every sector of our economy, marshaling the creativity, courage, and capital necessary to make our Nation resilient in the face of this threat. Together, we must combat the climate crisis with bold, progressive action that combines the full capacity of the Federal Government with efforts from every corner of our Nation, every level of government, and every sector of our economy."


I've got machines to run so I'll leave it there for now. Needless to say... The current administration is actively working feverishly to transform this nation and the rest of the world - leveraging our (citizens) capacity to due work as well as their own global influence - they are swinging for the fences with all they've got.

They know their actions are hurting economies all over the world including our own... It's being done intentionally.
 
Last edited:

SeymourDumore

Diamond
Joined
Aug 2, 2005
Location
CT
Selling crude into the market at high prices buffers the demand base which is influencing those prices.
This act nets the government coffers a profit on reserve purchased at prices during the Obama era, and reduces the cost to consumers as prices adjust to new supply metrics.
Wearing rose colored glasses aren't we?
The original purpose of the oil reserves is NOT to be the feel-good measure for price manipulation! Sure, it has been used by most - if not all - that came before for exactly that, nonetheless it isn't it's intent.
As far as the profit is concerned, sorry, I ain't buying it!
Sure, it was filled when oil prices were significantly lower, but now that we're depleting it, we'll also have to figure out how to replenish it.
And, it's replenishment sure as hell ain't gonna be at the price it was filled in the first place, not even at the level we're wasting it now!
On one hand, we have Mad Vlad and his war fucking with the markets causing uncertainty.
Then we have OPEC deciding to take 2M barrels off the market in fears of upcoming recession.
Those two together will make for one hell of a price increase, and a possible oil shortage which requires a refill of the reserves as soon as possible, price be damned.
 

PDW

Diamond
Joined
Jul 24, 2006
Location
Australia (Hobart)
weapons do not fight on their own. it needs to be repaired and maintained, transported. need people. and when there is no electricity, no communication, no water in the country. fighting becomes difficult

You are deliberately avoiding the point.

Russia threatened the weapons SUPPLIERS with consequences if they didn't stop supplying Ukraine. Russia is already - short of nukes - doing everything it can to destroy Ukraine.

So I repeat - just WHAT can Russia actually DO to the other countries supplying weapons?

The reason you won't answer is because, short of starting a nuclear WW3, the answer is - nothing. Russia has no economic leverage left, no conventional military available and no way of winning a conventional war against NATO anyway.

But feel free to post something irrelevant anyway.

PDW
 

standardparts

Diamond
Joined
Mar 26, 2019
.............Then we have OPEC deciding to take 2M barrels off the market in fears of upcoming recession.
Those two together will make for one hell of a price increase, and a possible oil shortage which requires a refill of the reserves as soon as possible, price be damned...........
A number of news sources is reporting that our current President asked the Saudis to delay the reduction in oil supply for another month or so which makes it appear that the President was worried about mid-term election timing.
-----"The Biden administration asked Saudi Arabia, the de-facto leader of oil producer group OPEC, to delay its decision on oil output by a month"...... "reiterated the Biden administration’s vow to reexamine its relationship with Riyadh (Saudi)",,,,,,,,, "President Joe Biden said there would be “consequences” for Saudi Arabia’s oil production cut".

And what does this have to do with manufacturing in the United States?-----This:."U.S. lawmakers have urged the cutting of military sales to Saudi Arabia, America’s top weapons buyer,"

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/13/bid...-postpone-opec-cut-by-a-month-saudis-say.html
 

CalG

Diamond
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Location
Vt USA
Huh? LPG market?

BTW, Russia's offer ( heard bits an pieces, need some more though ) of supply via NS2 is fishy as fuck!
From some of the things I've heard ( and none of this is fact, rather a bit better than rumors ) is that while damage to NS1 is substantial, one of the pipes of the NS2 pair is virtually intact.
So, if the Russian government is kind enough, they could restore a partial flow to Germany and the west.
All they'd have to do is... well, wotever Vladimir Vladimirovics demands.

If any of that is true, one must revisit the question of just who might have damaged the lines in the first place he?
You KNOW as much as I do.
NEWS ain't what it once was.
 

SeymourDumore

Diamond
Joined
Aug 2, 2005
Location
CT
You KNOW as much as I do.
NEWS ain't what it once was.

Ok, to the point: What do you mean by the US having the LPG market sewn up, or ... well ... anything about the US and the LPG market... :scratchchin:

Or, I'll just add these as a WTF.... 🧔‍♀️👯‍♂️👨‍👨‍👧‍👦👬👨‍👨‍👦
 

michiganbuck

Diamond
Joined
Jun 28, 2012
Location
Mt Clemens, Michigan 48035
I don't think Putin would wish to go down in the history books as the guy who started WW3, but who knows
Likely Putin thinks that this is not a NATO issue because Ukraine is not a NATO member.
China is setting on the sideline because China wants to take Taiwan.
The situation is really a big /serious mess.
 

Trueturning

Diamond
Joined
Jul 2, 2019
I don't think Putin would wish to go down in the history books as the guy who started WW3, but who knows
Likely Putin thinks that this is not a NATO issue because Ukraine is not a NATO member.
China is setting on the sideline because China wants to take Taiwan.
The situation is really a big /serious mess.
Yeah China wants Taiwan. It seems to me that Taiwan will not want that and that China would damage Taiwan if they should attack it. After all the Revolution is past. Meanwhile Taiwan produces advanced microchips which everyone needs. That means many countries have a interest in the current state of things. Given old habits the ways that China and Russia have in the past conducted war is very brutal. It seems they do not care much to just avoid civilian deaths for example. At least in the past this has been the case. China still has a long way to go until it really can project their military as s Superpower does.
 

mrSanders62

Hot Rolled
Joined
Jan 8, 2022
Huh? LPG market?

BTW, Russia's offer ( heard bits an pieces, need some more though ) of supply via NS2 is fishy as fuck!
From some of the things I've heard ( and none of this is fact, rather a bit better than rumors ) is that while damage to NS1 is substantial, one of the pipes of the NS2 pair is virtually intact.
So, if the Russian government is kind enough, they could restore a partial flow to Germany and the west.
All they'd have to do is... well, wotever Vladimir Vladimirovics demands.

If any of that is true, one must revisit the question of just who might have damaged the lines in the first place he?
you're paranoid dude. the northern stream was practically not working because of the turbines. and blowing up the second thread of thread 2 is probably not smart. Don't judge people by Hollywood movies
 

standardparts

Diamond
Joined
Mar 26, 2019
it's better to turn off the electricity than to do that............but maybe I'm wrong?
Damn impressive!----Except most of the Iraq power grid was taken down by graphite bombs that spread fine graphite wire over transmission lines and shorted the system. Remember reading that Iraq's electrical grid was in pretty bad shape to being with so likely it did not take much to fail it.. Graphite bombs were also used in Serbia(?).
 

Trueturning

Diamond
Joined
Jul 2, 2019
I do think a lot of people can be suspicious of much that is going on. Opec + Saudi has cut production already. Several members of OPEC + are not able to produce much more as they are maxed out as is Venezuela and Iran. Saudi intentionally has enough to rise and reduce the output.

I suppose this does effect Europe and the world greatly. That here in the US we have pulled back somewhat in fossil fuels. How will that work out for us? I think in the short term it will be difficult I know the move to Green is a solid effort and understand the reasons for it - even though I disagree with a lot of overly optimistic promotion of it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.








 
Top