Straightedge
Hot Rolled
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2009
- Location
- Germany/California
This thread is exactly like having a TV tuned to Fox News arguing with a TV tuned to MSNBC.
Who would do that to others?
So give us a first hand report from Germany......This thread is exactly like having a TV tuned to Fox News arguing with a TV tuned to MSNBC.
Age restricted ;-(Curious, have you watched her documentary?
I did, and it's a goddam shame it was never made mandatory watching for all to see!
In case you've missed it, can be found here:
If you don't have the whole hour, just watch the end, starting at 49:30 and tell me what you take away from it!
Yes, I viewed that full documentary some months back. sobering. Truth can be painful.Curious, have you watched her documentary?
I did, and it's a goddam shame it was never made mandatory watching for all to see!
In case you've missed it, can be found here:
If you don't have the whole hour, just watch the end, starting at 49:30 and tell me what you take away from it!
Yes, and that is just another example of the utter lack of common sense at the Youtube censorship.Age restricted ;-(
Truth can be painful.Yes, I viewed that full documentary some months back. sobering. Truth can be painful.
What has a front, has a back
Have you seen that video with McCain and L.Graham assuring the Ukraine military/ color revolutionaries after Maidan "We are with you"?Truth can be painful.
Also onesided if that's how you wish to present it.
But, you did say "what has a front, also has a back" so ...
Yes, but I fail to see the relevance with respect to your point.Have you seen that video with McCain and L.Graham assuring the Ukraine military/ color revolutionaries after Maidan "We are with you"?
NATO and EU membership.....maybe Ukraine represents too great a risk to NATO which is a money sponge and pays a whole lot of people to do very little militarily----same with the EU which seems to be a clever way to re-distribut wealth and carry out social change. The EU seemed perfectly fine with Russia as long as energy was cheap and plentiful.Yes, but I fail to see the relevance with respect to your point.
If the McCain/Graham ( or similar ) statements were to be used as a justification for Vlad's war ( as is often proclaimed by prominent figures even on PM ), then NATO and European Union memberships would be the appropriate talking point.
And yet, you are talking about the atrocities ( yes, plenty abound ) committed by the non government sanctioned, though widely ignored Ukranian nationalists instead.
(Yes, some of those were and still are pretty straight up Nazi believers)
So which is it?
I dont think you understand what NATO is. Its a treaty organisation, whereby countries agree to support each other if attacked. NATO doesnt "sponge" money. Each individual country decides what to spend on their own military, and those militaries get together for "NATO" purposes, but no soldier works for NATO. Each country decides on its own how much to spend on their military, although NATO recommends a percentage of GDP, there is no enforcement mechanism to make a country spend more or less.NATO and EU membership.....maybe Ukraine represents too great a risk to NATO which is a money sponge and pays a whole lot of people to do very little militarily----same with the EU which seems to be a clever way to re-distribut wealth and carry out social change. The EU seemed perfectly fine with Russia as long as energy was cheap and plentiful.
Just an opinion from someone looking from afar.
Well 'Buck' sure is a lot of musical chairs ongoing in Euro political leadership along with the upcoming midterms. We just might see the 'mother of all October surprises'!Nato in an agreement countries pay for the rights and privileges.
Is like independent job shops demanding union wages and benefits. Sure it would be nice if everybody was getting the best Bennis, but that is not how it works..It would be nice if everybody in the world was wealthy/safe/ content / well fed/ happy...
NATO to take on Russia would most likely start a world war...just stupid.
Sure we would win, with the USA and Russia leveled..but I would be dead..
While there are some civilian employees in Belgium, most people who work at NATO headquarters are serving members of various countries military. That would include somewhere between 2000 and 3000 US troops stationed in Brussels. They are just regular US soldiers, they dont get to slack off because NATO itself is not currently fielding soldiers in an active war zone. Many US military personell have worked on NATO related jobs while stationed in Europe, for the entire 70 years. Its just another posting.Anyway----Being on the NATO payroll and on staff at NATO headquarters in Brussels got to be a great gig because the only time NATO has ever been activated in 70 years is for a short time during 9-11.
While there are some civilian employees in Belgium, most people who work at NATO headquarters are serving members of various countries military. That would include somewhere between 2000 and 3000 US troops stationed in Brussels. They are just regular US soldiers, they dont get to slack off because NATO itself is not currently fielding soldiers in an active war zone. Many US military personell have worked on NATO related jobs while stationed in Europe, for the entire 70 years. Its just another posting.
Notice
This website or its third-party tools process personal data (e.g. browsing data or IP addresses) and use cookies or other identifiers, which are necessary for its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy. To learn more, please refer to the cookie policy. In case of sale of your personal information, you may opt out by sending us an email via our Contact Us page. To find out more about the categories of personal information collected and the purposes for which such information will be used, please refer to our privacy policy. You accept the use of cookies or other identifiers by closing or dismissing this notice, by scrolling this page, by clicking a link or button or by continuing to browse otherwise.