One other aspect to the high-quote issue is than with most companies, the default way to do a job (like a gear) is the "correct" way, where there is a print calling out the actual tolerances that have been determined by thorough measurement or engineering, and they make it exactly within tolerance using the best cutting tools and the best measuring methods so they don't get it wrong. It's potentially over machined because that's the safest way to keep it from coming back a second time with an angry customer. This might be just an open rough duty spur gear, but it's very well possible that some of the high quote is that they don't know if it's going on an egg beater or in a Ferrari's transmission. The transmission gear would work on the egg beater, but not visa versa, so which side are they going to error on?
When you have a case where a precision part can be totally fine being a little on the sloppy or crude side, the obvious reaction is it should be cheaper, but without firm dimensions and expectations given to the maker, I guarantee it would be sloppy and crude in all the wrong ways. The idea that "they should know" is utter nonsense. We have jobs in this category come across the desk all the time and there's never "one way" that is just default knowledge to "professionals," UNLESS you specify it in writing. It's one reason why so many companies turn down the onesy-twosy job-shop work.
Making a gear like this shouldn't be hard if you have the tools and time, but there is a BIG difference when you have your own hands on the process and the mating pieces all at arms reach, and if you have to make two cause the first one didn't fit, that's not costing you while the next bigger $$$ jobs are stacking up behind you.