MindCollizion
Plastic
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2019
I am not sure if this would be the best section to post this to, but I'm looking for help in determining where we are in error during the manufacturing/verification process of an internal HEX wrenching feature being broached into a cylindrical thread-rolled feature of the part.
We've been running into a lot of issues related to non-conformance of this feature (inspected by a HEX GO/NOGO ASME B18.3 Gages) once the thread-rolling process has been performed around it. We have attempted to swap the order in which the processes are performed (broaching before thread rolling, thread rolling before broaching) but the issue remains because of the size of the part itself (typically 0.094" and 0.078" NOM Socket size), so it's usually an issue for these smaller parts. It seems that the pressure of the rolling process affects the dimension of the HEX feature, making it non-conforming when it was acceptable beforehand.
Has anyone run into a similar problem or has any advice as to how I can proceed with determining the necessary changes to our manufacturing process?
Thanks in advance for your help, any info is truly appreciated.
We've been running into a lot of issues related to non-conformance of this feature (inspected by a HEX GO/NOGO ASME B18.3 Gages) once the thread-rolling process has been performed around it. We have attempted to swap the order in which the processes are performed (broaching before thread rolling, thread rolling before broaching) but the issue remains because of the size of the part itself (typically 0.094" and 0.078" NOM Socket size), so it's usually an issue for these smaller parts. It seems that the pressure of the rolling process affects the dimension of the HEX feature, making it non-conforming when it was acceptable beforehand.
Has anyone run into a similar problem or has any advice as to how I can proceed with determining the necessary changes to our manufacturing process?
Thanks in advance for your help, any info is truly appreciated.