michiganbuck
Diamond
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2012
- Location
- Mt Clemens, Michigan 48035
Likely the government will mandate that all trains be painted a nongender-related color... that should help.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trains are inherently masculine. If you've seen Naked Gun you know what I mean.Likely the government will mandate that all trains be painted a nongender-related color... that should help.
Im interested to read that article but it's behind a paywall. Can yoh copy/paste it here?
been around since bronze sleeve bearings so not a new thing, at least since the 70,s when the idea was related to me by a Southern RR dispatcher that I knew personallyNo, my point was directed to "Hot boxes became an old problem after railcars stopped using bronze sleeve bearings and upgraded to rollers, so I am guessing the hotbox detectors were not maintained properly due to a rare over heating problem ."
Detectors are a new thing, to replace one of the many functions of the caboose.
so they ignored the hot bearing and kept on going ? I bet that goes over like a fart in a space suit when this goes to courtYou are guessing wrong.
Im interested to read that article but it's behind a paywall. Can yoh copy/paste it heBehind a paywall is just that . I was curious myself becaue I kew a dispatcher for Southern back in the 70.s and he related the hot box detectors to me at that time ,so they are not a new thing by any means . If you want to read the entire article that's the breaks. If they ignored the hot box red flags and kept going or if the detectors were not working they have a big problem either way in court. A few other posts suggested they ignored the hot bearing [ so I have no idea if that is confirmed as truth] . I am pretty sure no one owned up to " we ignored the problem"
The "guess" was that detectors were not properly maintained or functioning. The report states that the bearing in question was measured and found close to the limit but below the threshold for an alarm at one detector, then alarmed out at the next but it was slightly too late. It's just one of those worst-case scenarios. In Engineering you have the choice to either A: make everything work with the absolute worst possibility that you can think of, or B: can catch 95% or more of the real life conditions and spend half as much on the system. Even option A won't get all of them because the smartest engineer may still be wrong about the true worst case.
Using a government agency to mandate option A will increase cost burden significantly and perhaps decrease failures a little bit, but it makes us all feel good right? Because once we tell those greedy rail companies they have to run cargo safely to its destination, they'll do it!
Your just guessing, try sitting on your hands for awhile.so they ignored the hot bearing and kept on going ? I bet that goes over like a fart in a space suit when this goes to court
Hard to believe a bearing ran hot enough to burn thru and axel in 38 miles so we may never know what caused the wreck . Detectors could have given a false reading so we will see how the investigation continues
I guess many inventions would work but all add cost and maintenance, seems the on-the-line heat checkers are good...but likely a bearing goes from Ok to too hot in a short time... A haz-waste car might demand an every 6 months greasing.seems to me an electrically energized brush set 1/16" inch away from the axle, inside the bearing assembly, would make electrical contact with the ground up bits of the bearing, or make electrical contact with the shaft due to displacment, long before the bearing fails to the point you can't stop the train quick enough to prevent derailment.
seems to me an electrically energized brush set 1/16" inch away from the axle, inside the bearing assembly, would make electrical contact with the ground up bits of the bearing, or make electrical contact with the shaft due to displacment, long before the bearing fails to the point you can't stop the train quick enough to prevent derailment.
Not familiar with railroad regulations and practices...but if an incident/accident rate exceeded the norm by a large margin in aviation the DOT, in conjunction with the FAA would be seriously stepping up oversight.It's not the second... It's the 4th in less than 6 months!
Sandusky, Ravenna, East Palestine and now Springfield.
But hey, statistics don't lie. It's just par for the course, nothing to see here...
Notice
This website or its third-party tools process personal data (e.g. browsing data or IP addresses) and use cookies or other identifiers, which are necessary for its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy. To learn more, please refer to the cookie policy. In case of sale of your personal information, you may opt out by sending us an email via our Contact Us page. To find out more about the categories of personal information collected and the purposes for which such information will be used, please refer to our privacy policy. You accept the use of cookies or other identifiers by closing or dismissing this notice, by scrolling this page, by clicking a link or button or by continuing to browse otherwise.