The gist is using a loctite compound between the main bearing caps and block on an engine to help prevent fretting/cap walk. The concern I have is will using a compound throw off bearing clearances/create an out of round situation orthogonal to the crankshaft?
I had a short conversation with Henkel who suggested 640 for this application. That's more-so used for retaining bearings and keeping cylindrical press/slip fits from from rotating within their bore. Based on the TDS it looks like it would hold up to the oil and 200F temperatures. It's very low viscosity.
I know that cummins uses 518 in their ISX platform:


This seems to be a thicker compound used for flange gaskets, and the TDS makes mention of lap joint shear strength while the 640 does not. They warn about using "other sealants" as they could become brittle and cease to function. I don't know if 640 was considered within the context of that statement though as it's not a sealant.
So the big question is two-fold: which compound would better suit the heat, oil, and the high number of cyclical forces that the bearing cap will endure, and will using one of these compounds add "thickness" between the mating surfaces, causing an out of round condition? For context, the diameter tolerance for the bearing when the caps are torqued down is two thousandths, and there are four fasteners per cap delivering a clamping force of 22,700 pounds each.
I had a short conversation with Henkel who suggested 640 for this application. That's more-so used for retaining bearings and keeping cylindrical press/slip fits from from rotating within their bore. Based on the TDS it looks like it would hold up to the oil and 200F temperatures. It's very low viscosity.
I know that cummins uses 518 in their ISX platform:


This seems to be a thicker compound used for flange gaskets, and the TDS makes mention of lap joint shear strength while the 640 does not. They warn about using "other sealants" as they could become brittle and cease to function. I don't know if 640 was considered within the context of that statement though as it's not a sealant.
So the big question is two-fold: which compound would better suit the heat, oil, and the high number of cyclical forces that the bearing cap will endure, and will using one of these compounds add "thickness" between the mating surfaces, causing an out of round condition? For context, the diameter tolerance for the bearing when the caps are torqued down is two thousandths, and there are four fasteners per cap delivering a clamping force of 22,700 pounds each.