Cryogenic treating of tools, or cryogenic machining.
whats wrong with it, except cost? a lot of stuff gets treated today.
Last edited:
Cryogenic treating of tools, or cryogenic machining.
I'd agree you can put 3D printing in here too. The reality is fine, many of us use them all the time, but they really aren't improving the way the insane hype has been suggesting now for many years.
Years ago there was all this hype about some shit called CNC. As opposed to just turning a handle? Never going to happen, I said
And it's gonna take all our jobs...you wait and see!
whats wrong with it, except cost? a lot of stuff get treated today.
but they really aren't improving the way the insane hype has been suggesting now for many years.
Lincoln electric can't get a welding robot to work right, I don't see them making a go of this.
There was definitely a lot of hype with cryo treating steel. My limited understanding is that its efficacy varies widely with different alloys. I know the ASM handbook recommends it after quenching 52100.
For cryogenic machining, I've heard it works really well. Pratt & Whitney did some work with it. Unfortunately, getting a working through-spindle liquid nitrogen setup isn't cheap or easy. If you're not doing lots of high-end titanium or superalloy work, it's not worth it.
The coolant idea that I always thought was neat was super-critical CO2. Looked pretty interesting.
Wow! There must be an interesting story behind this saddle sore.
Tested it. Meh. Not for us. May be useful to some.
Now I gotta look up a Hexapod.
Hey! I wonder what happened to that idea. It lack rigidity?
Programmed via Mazatrol
I did a great deal of research on Hexapod machines and in fact wrote a (now out of print) book on it that was part of my graduate thesis. At the time (90s) the technology looked promising. But costs, as well as other factors doomed it, at least for now. It was considered so good at the time, that there were major export controls on the technology.
Several dis-gruntled (or is that just "gruntled") customers, check the archives.
Maybe your a wee bit more in bed with Lincoln than you let on ?
Now I gotta look up a Hexapod.
Hey! I wonder what happened to that idea. It lack rigidity?
Programmed via Mazatrol
The LN2 or the super-critical CO2?
Can you tell us more? I've always thought it sounded interesting.
I worked with Lincoln in the past. I have no connections today other than I use some Lincoln products and know some people there.
There are a lot of reasons automation might fail. Poor design, poor integration, poor part fitup, process control variation, poor management.... The vast majority of installations work well.
I think Lincoln's additive business is a great way to develop the technology. They are making real large-scale parts for real customers. Think applications like replacing large complex forgings with long lead times or large Invar sheet forms for composite layups. They have a dedicated facility with a large number of robots and people engaged in it. And, they are eating their own cooking with the automation.
PEEK is as fun to cut as Delrin
Yes it is.
Until you scrap a part. Oof, that stuff is friggin expensive!