hanermo
Titanium
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2009
- Location
- barcelona, spain
The moral is:
WILL VinFast actually make EV batteries or components in scale, in the US, in the medium/long term of 5/10 years ??
My opinion is that this has about a 2% probability.
It is NOT that they might not actually make some sort of plant and hire some people and make some batteries or components.
They very well might -- ..
But to be economically viable, those batteries must be as good as the market leader,
must be produced in scale,
must reduce costs // prices in line with the market leader,
must have the energy density of the market leader,
... and ideally must have some benefit vs the market leader in being smaller, lighter, more energy dense (most critical), cheaper, easier to produce or something similar.
So far, for 15 years, we have seen exactly zero technologically superior products to the tesla // market leader battery solutions.
Maybe 40 deployed batteries with 10 main brands using them in leafs, renaults, bolts, porsches, vw, etc.
Exactly zero of them are Really Really Really good in something.
It is Hard to make a really good new motive battery.
So the above and current companies are land grabs and flim flam like sakti3, which was written down to zero after a 35 M $ buy out for solid state. Lies, basically, iirc.
More than 200 companies are now pursuing this goal with multi-million financing.
Obviously, Pretty Soon Now, 5 y, several will have real working products.
Those companies who solve it will triumph, but more importantly the battery tech will improve either a bit or more likely dramatically.
I think every scandinavian leader and us leader who has supported these flimflam battery mirages should be made personally responsible financially.
WILL VinFast actually make EV batteries or components in scale, in the US, in the medium/long term of 5/10 years ??
My opinion is that this has about a 2% probability.
It is NOT that they might not actually make some sort of plant and hire some people and make some batteries or components.
They very well might -- ..
But to be economically viable, those batteries must be as good as the market leader,
must be produced in scale,
must reduce costs // prices in line with the market leader,
must have the energy density of the market leader,
... and ideally must have some benefit vs the market leader in being smaller, lighter, more energy dense (most critical), cheaper, easier to produce or something similar.
So far, for 15 years, we have seen exactly zero technologically superior products to the tesla // market leader battery solutions.
Maybe 40 deployed batteries with 10 main brands using them in leafs, renaults, bolts, porsches, vw, etc.
Exactly zero of them are Really Really Really good in something.
It is Hard to make a really good new motive battery.
So the above and current companies are land grabs and flim flam like sakti3, which was written down to zero after a 35 M $ buy out for solid state. Lies, basically, iirc.
More than 200 companies are now pursuing this goal with multi-million financing.
Obviously, Pretty Soon Now, 5 y, several will have real working products.
Those companies who solve it will triumph, but more importantly the battery tech will improve either a bit or more likely dramatically.
I think every scandinavian leader and us leader who has supported these flimflam battery mirages should be made personally responsible financially.