What's new
What's new

OT - US Constitution, Article II, Section 4

Sea Farmer

Diamond
Joined
Mar 25, 2006
Location
Cape Cod, Massachusetts
Ann Coulter tweet this morning: "At this point, who DOESN'T want Trump impeached?"

https://twitter.com/AnnCoulter/

What will she do with all the unsold copies of her last book, "In Trump We Trust?" :D
 

Toolroomguy

Cast Iron
Joined
Jul 9, 2010
Location
Wisconsin
I just put down what I believe to be fact, if people want to debate that it's fine. There is still the underlying problem that if you believe in property rights, the entire edifice fails because all real property in North America is stolen. With the exception of Manhattan, it was all taken at gunpoint.
Every single deed to real property in the US is fraudulent.
Homo habilis had their land taken by Homo ergaster,who lost it to Homo antecessor, who then were robbed by Homo floresiensis,and then them darn Homo sapiens stole the land. So who does it belong to?
 

SeaMoss

Banned
Joined
Mar 17, 2017
Marvin the Martian, actually.
:D Called a friend up during the 1989 earthquake. He worked in the city.

"So, dude, how's it going over there ? We've got waves in the road here, about a foot high. Cool !"

"Same here, I'm on the road now, kinda shaky but figger the commute home tonight is gonna be a bitch so I'll get a head start ..."

"Boy is this gonna be a mess ..."

"Yeah but God's stuff isn't hurt at all ..."

And he's not religious.
 

Mcgyver

Diamond
Joined
Aug 5, 2005
Location
Toronto
Homo habilis had their land taken by Homo ergaster,who lost it to Homo antecessor, who then were robbed by Homo floresiensis,and then them darn Homo sapiens stole the land. So who does it belong to?

My Dad was a really hairy guy, I think it was all his. and I want it back
 
Joined
May 29, 2010
Location
Denmark
I love the United States Navy and we use it as we feel we need to in order to protect free travel and trade.

This might make him change his mind but I agree much more with the SeaMoss version that with yours.

When the US does what it does then it is to protect US interests. No more, no less. Of coarse that is popular with the countries that have things in common with US interests.

I'm NOT being anti American. It's just something all major countries do to protect their own interests. How many countries help others militarily without being sure they themselves benefit from it?
 

SeaMoss

Banned
Joined
Mar 17, 2017
When the US does what it does then it is to protect US interests. No more, no less.
Not "US interests" .. the interests of a few people in the US

the most decorated man in the US military said:
War is just a racket. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of people. Only a small inside group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the masses.

I believe in adequate defense at the coastline and nothing else. If a nation comes over here to fight, then we'll fight. The trouble with America is that when the dollar only earns 6 percent over here, then it gets restless and goes overseas to get 100 percent. Then the flag follows the dollar and the soldiers follow the flag.

I wouldn't go to war again as I have done to protect some lousy investment of the bankers. There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket.

There isn't a trick in the racketeering bag that the military gang is blind to. It has its "finger men" to point out enemies, its "muscle men" to destroy enemies, its "brain men" to plan war preparations, and a "Big Boss" Super-Nationalistic-Capitalism.

It may seem odd for me, a military man to adopt such a comparison. Truthfulness compels me to. I spent thirty- three years and four months in active military service as a member of this country's most agile military force, the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from Second Lieutenant to Major-General. And during that period, I spent most of my time being a high class muscle- man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the Bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism.

I suspected I was just part of a racket at the time. Now I am sure of it. Like all the members of the military profession, I never had a thought of my own until I left the service. My mental faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of higher-ups. This is typical with everyone in the military service.

I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912 (where have I heard that name before?). I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested.

During those years, I had, as the boys in the back room would say, a swell racket. Looking back on it, I feel that I could have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.


https://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/warisaracket.html
 

SeaMoss

Banned
Joined
Mar 17, 2017
The light at the end of the tunnel ...
William Westmoreland isn't usually the best guy to quote ...

628x471.jpg
 








 
Top