tailstock4
Cast Iron
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2013
- Location
- Oklahoma, USA
I found my picture of the old Monarch and Rivett spindle bearings for anyone that may be curious. I went back with NOS New Departure class 7 bearings on the Rivett (which I was lucky to find a good deal on.) On the Monarch I went back with Fafnir class 7 bearings with an additional .0002 preload which I achieved by undergrinding the inner spacer.Thanks. I haven’t done a write-up of this machine. I have shown a few pictures of it but not a whole lot more. On a couple of occasions, I’ve mentioned that I’ve changed the spindle bearings on this machine. I’m sharing a few more details impart as I am curious if anyone else has found some of the issues I came across.
I found that Rivett uses a little smaller class 7 spindle bearings with an additional ball or two as compared to the Monarch, but they have the same contact angle. My Rivett’s spindle was original, meaning it had never been taken apart. I found that Rivett had used a set of non-matched bearings. When I had the spacers on a surface plate, I found over a .001 difference between the inner and outer spacers – the inner being smaller. My front flange bearing actually had a negative preload – meaning the internal race extended inward. This in part explains the some of the large difference in spacer heights. It also means Rivett used a custom preload which caused me a great deal more work and research.
I eventually talked to a bearing engineer, and he was able to determine the various preloads for these bearings in terms of light, medium and heavy. He converted each of these from Newtons to microns to .0001’s. This coupled with some special ground spacers I made for the surface plate and these bearings allowed me to stack the bearings and their spacers in their preloaded state and take measurements. In the end I found that the Rivett has a slightly higher preloaded spindle than the Monarch. I also found that after checking the spindle’s concentricity there was an almost unmeasurable runout, but it did cause me to slightly disagree with Rivett’s original placement of the bearing highpoint markings. This made me wonder how much attention they really gave this when they assembled it.
In the end it turned out well for me. I ended up with less than .00005 runout at the spindle nose. There are some other differences and of course a lot more to it. I just wanted to convey what I had found with the custom preload that Rivett had used on my lathe.
Incidentally the Monarch is a 1968 modular machine.
