What's new
What's new

Threading insert IR vs. EL, or ER vs IL, NR, NL etc.

  • Thread starter Thread starter rabtrfld
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies 8
  • Views 5,621

rabtrfld

Aluminum
Joined
Oct 11, 2016
Location
WI USA
Guys, I'm sorry to flog this subject, I know there are 1500 posts about threading but I have been searching & reading on-line for WEEKS and still haven't found what I need to know.
This is for maintenance and R&D, not production, and I buy my own tools so I'll be using the cheap stuff on Ebay like Shars, etc. That stuff always works fine for me. Not worried about details like coatings & grades & chipbreakers, & speeds & feeds etc. because it's all random mystery metal scrap. (Not really, I usually know what it is, but sometimes 12L14, H13, M2, S7, 4140, whatever is lying around.) I am willing to deal with the deflection, chatter, finish & thread form issues, etc. as required. Using a Clausing with DRO but no threading stop or "clock."

1) I will ALWAYS cut RH threads away from the chuck. That means the spindle is "reversed", and the tool is in "back" of the bar.
2) Assume there is always a blind hole or external flange on the left, hence the reversed feed. If there wasn't, I'd just use a tap or die anyway.
3) Can't turn the tool upside down on this lathe. It lifts up the saddle. I have done it with care from necessity but it is not a good plan.
3) I have learned to NEVER, EVER unclamp the halfnut once I get started, even though I theoretically know how to do it, I have always managed to ruin a good thread on the last pass because I wanted to try the fit on a workpiece and get the tool out of the way in a hurry. I start with a relief groove with about 0.01in of clearance and after each pass, slowly jog the DRO back to zero. After sweating bullets for 10 passes on S7 I just don't have the nerves to risk opening the nut without blowing it. If I really have to, I'm better off just re-locating the groove from scratch instead of trying to phase the leadscrew properly.

About the biggest I have to deal with is 7/8-9. I'm going to buy four boring bars, two each inside & outside for size 11 and 16 triangle laydowns. With non-topping inserts in a couple of radii to cover a wide range. The cheap holders I'm looking at dont have shims, that's OK. Basically "SNR/L0010K11" type bars.

So my question is, what the hell is the difference between 11IR, 11NR, and 11EL inserts (which look the same in pictures). Or their mirror-images, 11IL, 11NL, 11ER.
It seems to me, cutting a right-hand thread on the "back" side, the helix angle is reversed. For example, holder SNR0010K11 with 11ER is apparently made for External Right-hand threads cut on the "front", it looks positioned correctly for Internal threads on the "back." Except the helix angle would be reversed! So I don't know which inserts to buy. The IR and ER are by far the most abundant online. My budget is low, I'm spending about $100/wk on tools & parts, but it is the ebay lead time that is killer if I buy the wrong stuff. (Wrong stuff always finds a use, anyway.) None of the mfr.s web sites that I've been able to find explained the real difference between R & L inserts.

Am I the only guy that cuts threads backwards? (BTW I have already cut left threads by mistake, reversed the tool AND the spindle, and cut another beautiful left thread!:nutter:)
 
Well... thanks, I have that chart, & several others, but it doesn't tell me anything. It doesn't show the difference in geometry between IR and EL, which look exactly the same in plan view. It doesn't help that I don't know the exact geometry of the proposed toolholders, I'd really like to see a specified drawing rather than an ebay photo. The toolholder may have either a tilt for helix or a rake angle built in, or both or neither. Maybe I should just pay a little more for brand-name threading bars that have a legit website with drawings.
(edit: sorry, I meant clearance, not rake angle)
 
rabtrfld, the larger sizes of laydown threading toolholders have shims to control helix angle. On the smaller ones,
you just learn to live with the compromise of whatever helix is built into the toolholder.

Go download the Carmex or Vargus catalogs for these inserts and toolholders. That will give you all the
data, including which combination of insert and toolholder "hands" you need when cutting internal RH threads
away from the chuck. Yes, both the insert and the toolholders are handed.

Go to this page and download the "Thread Turning Technical Section". Look at pages 69 through 71.
I'd link directly to that document but they are playing coy with their website and
it doesn't have an exposed URL.
 
Page 6 of Carmex's technical section has a lot of the answers you're looking for. I will add a few things, though.

First of all, 11NR is the same as 11IR. Some manufacturers use different nomenclature for internal threading inserts. They all seem to use 11ER for external, though.

If you look at a IR and EL insert of the same pitch, they look the same at first. There are some differences if you look closer, though. The IR has more "hook" ground into it. This is because internal and external inserts are held at different angles relative to the diameter of the part. Then, the profiles are a little different, too. The EL has a taller profile, a more radiused tip, and the base of the triangle is wider.

All that being said, I have made threads using an internal insert to make external threads (or was it the other way around?) that fit between gages and measured correctly as far as I could tell. This was in a pinch and not for a customer's parts, but it worked for my purposes. So, you can get away with it, though the thread profile and the cutting action of the tool might not be perfect.
 
All that being said, I have made threads using an internal insert to make external threads (or was it the other way around?) that fit between gages and measured correctly as far as I could tell. This was in a pinch and not for a customer's parts, but it worked for my purposes. So, you can get away with it, though the thread profile and the cutting action of the tool might not be perfect.

I have done the same when I didn't have the correct insert.
 
i have to wade in here, as im in the same boat, looking at acme inserts, trying to economise...
so...page 70 (5?) of this http://www.carmexusa.com/contentonly.aspx?file=pdf/2019_Inch/065-074_thread_turning_technical.pdf shows that the important difference of LH and RH threads, the FLANK ANGLE... is the same. only the buttress being different. and then the next page shows its the tool holder, anvil, that tilts the insert over for LH or RH thread helixes.

L and R designating the hand of the insert and holder, to suit various machine setups, rather than a reference to the hand of the thread they cut.

so, im sort of leaning towards a SNL so i can do internals at the back, externals at the front with an SER, both using 16ER inserts.

except... internals have slightly more clearance, front and flank. makes sense, as its curling in underneath, whilst externals curling away. an ER would limit the ID... though im aiming for 40mm anyway. usually pretty good at that ID.

so do i swap everything, go SNR/SEL with IL? or is that IR? now im really getting confused, lol...

internal will have the weaker edge...

and then theres the bit about geometry, clearance... min and maj diameter... eek.

if i was only doing one pitch, id probably just get ER/IR...
 








 
Back
Top