Trboatworks
Diamond
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2010
- Location
- Maryland- USA
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It says "world's largest polymer printer" ... aka unreinforced gloop ?Thanks a lot- its like revenge of the nerds and putting honest working stiffs out of a job....
I'm fairly certain that the boat they printed was nowhere near 100 feet long, it looked more like twenty. How long does it take to lay up a 20 foot fiberglass hull? I'd be shocked if it was more than 48 work hours, to say nothing of "months."
When you can 3d print the 99% of the cost in a boat that's not a bathtub, then we'll be onto something.
Is this better than CNC milling a master? and then laying up tooling off that? Maybe. Does it have uses? Certainly. Is it going to revolutionize anything? Hard to imagine how.
CNC milling a mold that big isn't cheap or fast.
It says "world's largest polymer printer" ... aka unreinforced gloop ?
So let's drop a nice 16v149 or two in there, a few thousand gallons of fuel, and take her out Juan de Fuca at max ebb on a nice windy day. Don't forget to pre-alert the Coast Guard
They make such a big deal out of "we did this in two days" but if it breaks in the first rough weather, what's the point ?
boat stresses
Sam- you might recognize that I am well aware of the material issues in marine structures.
I look at this and immediately understand two penalties- weight and material yield.
I don't make those observations because they are besides the point which is that application of a tech which might have use in the industry.
I watched a military helicopter body being lain down from prepreg carbon fiber with a huge CNC- same thing- automation to optimize structure..
EONs ago as I chatted up my pals while we were taking a break from framing up some residential homes.
I mused that this tacking bits of trees together with iron spikes was a primitive way to go about things.
At the time I offered that the construction of the future would be organic based but derived from a type of fast growing algae mat which would induced to grow over a lightweight armature and solidify into a rigid structure.
Screw this chopping up plants and bits and pieces cobbled together I want a mononique organic frame house- no fasteners eh
I own one of the very first one piece composite boats- 41' lain in 1956 from a tech developed during WWII- fiber (linen during war) lain in thermoset plastics- Fiber Reinforced Plastics (FRP).
So currently we use sheets of metal set on frame or fiber set in plastics- largely gone are the days of chopping up large plants for structural planks.
I did see a remarkable skiff years back- they took FRP planks and I shit you not- carvel planked the hull (lapped with edge fasteners and caulk).
Talking about not "getting it"... LOL
I do see a time where foundry products tacked together will be replaced with formed in place materials- alas not my algal mat.... I did dream the big dream though..
Edit-
I can't help but dream the big dreams- this homebuilding thing- we REALLY need to get away from bits and pieces of wood or masonry cobbled together.
How about this- prepreg inflatable structure- inflate and UV cure the shell.
I know I know... pesky things like multi floor homes, stairs etc.....
I am working on it- maybe another beer will help me think..
This current approach drives me crazy though- I just got finished hanging sheet rock in the shop- what the hell - sheets of gypsum and smearing mud over the walls to fair it all up- when the hell do I live- 1440's?
"Honey I've got to finish the kids room- I'm out of mud and will be right back"....
Gypsum - Wikipedia
Yup....this is just the start, they will fix the problems, recall these ?
You'd mill a master, and lay up (one or more molds) off of that.
I'd be curious to know why you feel the costs would be better for the 3d printer. The gantry on this would cost the same as the gantry on an equivalently sized router. You're talking a foam tooling board in the routing case, so no real resistance either way. So the accuracy and speed would be the same between the two at equivalent cost. So, the machine time to create the surface should be the same. With the 3d printer, you're taking additional time to print the support structure under the skin. With the router you're taking additional time to rough out the material to get down close to the skin. So, approximately, you're trading the machine time to rough a milled master for the machine time to print supports and reinforce the printed master.
Either way, you're going to have to sand and fill the master (or the mold, if you're thinking you can print molds directly.)
If this were such a slam dunk, it'd be being done at a commercial boat builder, not a university.
Notice
This website or its third-party tools process personal data (e.g. browsing data or IP addresses) and use cookies or other identifiers, which are necessary for its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy. To learn more, please refer to the cookie policy. In case of sale of your personal information, you may opt out by sending us an email via our Contact Us page. To find out more about the categories of personal information collected and the purposes for which such information will be used, please refer to our privacy policy. You accept the use of cookies or other identifiers by closing or dismissing this notice, by scrolling this page, by clicking a link or button or by continuing to browse otherwise.