It consists of three plates of two sides. So A-B is one plate.
A 189 177 171 147 129 117 99 91 89 48 30
B 199 183 169 157 141 127 111 97 81 67 36
C 197 181 167 153 139 123 109 93 79 46 34
D 193 179 163 151 137 121 107 89 77 44 32
E 191 175 161 149 133 119 103 87 73 42 26
F 187 173 159 143 131 113 101 83 71 38 28
I guess they could be adapted or modified but not by me.
You may not HAVE to adapt.
First, put them into the more common order, lower number first. Become aware that whilst bore, diameter, and affixing screws are all over the lot, many and several DH, the "division" sets fall into roughly three family groupings of "numbers", Brown & Sharpe's original 3 plate set the most often copied.
Second, it isn't rocket-fu to adapt an "alien" plate. Simply bush an oversize one or extend the shaft with a down-size for undersized bore.
But "Why"?
My handy-tiny Ellis DH was made with an "extended" collection of plates. Took a while, but now I have them all.
And then.. there is an Old Skewl trick, even so.
It has a 40:1 worm ratio.
Not uncommon for a rotab/DH to have a NINETY to one ratio.
Or the reverse. "Whatever" yah got, the point is the ratios are not 2:1 or such, but "odd".
Now "Do the math".
ALMOST all of yer divisions come out differently, BUT.. produce a division you already have anyway. No gain. But "almost" isn't the end of the tale.
Not ALL produce duplicates... so yah pick up a few MORE numbers.
If you still need to go overly anal as to "having it ALL"?
Make up a chart of what yer missing ....and have a CNC guy make you a plate with a few rows.
I can't really be bothered. "High" numbers are skeerce. See Bulova "Accutron" wheels.
Otherwise, if "industry" in general had NEEDED the missing divisions the past 150 years?
They'd already be ON a plate.