cat or nmtb40 er-32 collet chuck with shortest possible gage length is very handy on the Nichols, the y axis does not give a lot of room for drilling. A small drill chuck on a straight shank is handy to provide some reach for the drill but a full-on cat/nmtb40 drill chuck starts to be a bit long for the machine unless chosen carefully.
Weldon shank endmill holders are a great match for larger tooling, I probably use them most often on the Nichols, followed by large diameter thin slitting saws ( >=4" diam, few 64th's thickness). Shell end-mills are super handy too- the nmtb40 spindle is a big advantage. Production feed is advantageous for the saws and shell-endmills, gives a much better feel for how the tool is cutting.
My Burke is # 9 B&S, but soo, too the vertical head of the Quartet and the Ellis DH. I'm well covered with 9 B&S collets, a 9 B&S master-collet that holds Gorton triangual-tail collets - ranges just expanded, thanks to surplus Brian Miller had - a goodly range of 9 B&S side-locks, both ER-40 and ER-20 plus PDQ-Marlin "VS", some adapters to MT, and a few conventional drill-chucks.
The short 13" one-tee-slot table is the pivoted "universal" type, but would be a point of some frustration, were it not for the 48" table on the nearby Quartet - and its 40-taper 5 HP horizontal spindle.
Adam's late Dad also included a K&T slotter and a K&T angle head, (40-taper), that had been adapted to the Quartet, so I suppose it was already technically a "sextet". If/as/when I cobble the cold-saw and chuck/faceplate adapters for "tee lathe" I have in mind for it into being, then Septet and Octet?
At over 5200 Avoir, it is no "Shopsmith" level Swiss Army knife, but all that wants a minimum 9-foot radius circle to allow the 180-degree changeover, vertical to horizontal alone (Horizontal is in the turret, not the base!).
I can can see why they failed in the marketplace.
Even in tight space on a seagoing vessel, two separate mills plus a drillpress take up less floorspace and can be used by three people on three jobs instead of one person on one job at a time. OR.. for one person... require less time wasted on re-configuring, back and forth.
And did I forget to mention "complicated"? I suspect the reason no manuals can be found for Quartet combo mills is that Houdaille buried them to avoid risk of a patent war with Rube Goldberg's heirs.
I had set-out to acquire a Van Norman or a Diamond mill with sliding head, overlooked the nearly identical-to-Diamond Nichols out of ignorance at the time.
I was not even aware the sliding head could be used with a handlever feed to play an "active" role as an extra axis, not just be positioned statically and locked. More versatile than first appears, the Nichols, Diamond, and a workalike with sliding head that Burke also made.
I would have been so much better served with any of those vs the tiny Burke I DID buy that I might never have acquired the overly complex Quartet and dragged it a thousand miles home!
OTOH, I don't "make" anything but excursions after more trivial knowledge than I've already put by, tests, excuses, or the odd repair to the Old Iron as an end-product when procrastination unexpectedly fails... so the complexity has been a bit of fun. So far.