Bridgeport Textron Question
I own two Bridgeport mills with 2J heads. One is a Textron built in 1981 and the other is an older Bridgeport built in 1977. The backlash in both units is the same and runs ~.050 in the longitudinal direction and ~0.20 in the cross-feed direction. Both machines need some repair work in the varidrive assemblies which I have started to perform. Once the drives are functional, I will be able to test the heads to determine if all the functions work as they should. Here are a few facts.
The Textron unit seems to have been set up for flood coolant. It has coolant slots that run the length of the table between the outer T-slots and sides of the table. The base of the mill has a coolant sump built into the casting (this will be a mess to clean up). The ways on the knee are chrome plated and look to be in pretty good shape in that most of the flaking is still visible. It has a Servo power feed that runs well.
The Bridgeport unit does not have a coolant sump in the base nor any additional slots in the table. The ways on the knee are significantly warn. The flaking is visible only near the ends of the ways, there is no chrome plating and the wipers may be missing from a couple locations. It has a Bridgeport power feed that runs well.
I'm seeking recommendations as to which mill I should keep and which I should sell after the repair work is completed. I plan to re-scrape the ways on the unit I will keep. In general, I think the Textron is in better shape. Is it possible to scrap the chrome ways? Thanks in advance for any inputs you can provide.
I own two Bridgeport mills with 2J heads. One is a Textron built in 1981 and the other is an older Bridgeport built in 1977. The backlash in both units is the same and runs ~.050 in the longitudinal direction and ~0.20 in the cross-feed direction. Both machines need some repair work in the varidrive assemblies which I have started to perform. Once the drives are functional, I will be able to test the heads to determine if all the functions work as they should. Here are a few facts.
The Textron unit seems to have been set up for flood coolant. It has coolant slots that run the length of the table between the outer T-slots and sides of the table. The base of the mill has a coolant sump built into the casting (this will be a mess to clean up). The ways on the knee are chrome plated and look to be in pretty good shape in that most of the flaking is still visible. It has a Servo power feed that runs well.
The Bridgeport unit does not have a coolant sump in the base nor any additional slots in the table. The ways on the knee are significantly warn. The flaking is visible only near the ends of the ways, there is no chrome plating and the wipers may be missing from a couple locations. It has a Bridgeport power feed that runs well.
I'm seeking recommendations as to which mill I should keep and which I should sell after the repair work is completed. I plan to re-scrape the ways on the unit I will keep. In general, I think the Textron is in better shape. Is it possible to scrap the chrome ways? Thanks in advance for any inputs you can provide.