Toolbert
Stainless
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2003
- Location
- Vashon Island, WA
A job so simple I prepared no extra blanks, only the exact number of waterjet-cut blanks as what could possibly go wrong. Just a bunch of 3/8"-16 form-tapped holes in steel - spot, drill, chamfer mill, tap. Both the spot and chamfer ops done using a carbide 1/4" 90 deg spot drill.
On the final part, the carbide spot drill broke, and so the drill made an off-center hole, and the tap broke in the hole. But why on earth would the spot drill break?
It broke because I forgot to set "arc slowdown" for the chamfer mill op. For that op, I like to plunge close to the hole center, with a 170 deg arc tangential lead-in. The arc traversed by the center of the cutter is very small - and so the effective feed rate where the cutting happens is some multiple of the programmed feed rate. For a reasonable chip load, the feed needs to be ~20% of the feed rate for a straight-line cut. So here I figure it was taking a .010" per tooth cut, thin ice, worked for ~40 holes but in the end was too much for a 1/4" cutter.
BobCAM even in its latest greatest version still provides no assistance for simple feed adjustments - you're expected to do the math manually based on the difference btw. the part edge radius and the programmed toolpath radius, and depending on the circumstances, either enter an arc slowdown %, or just enter a proportionately slower feed rate.
This is basic, the only problem is it was such a simple part, I forgot to do it.
Anyway, so how do the other basic / low end CAM packages address this? How far up the food chain do you have to buy before the CAM automatically calculates reasonable feed rates for arcs, in particular, with awareness of which side of the part line the cut is on? One of the reasons I think BobCAM does not do this is because it's generally stupid about which side of the part line the cut is on, i.e. not able to distinguish whether it's an increased feed rate because it's a convex feature, or a decreased feed for concave.
Having used no other CAM, hard to tell if I'm an idiot for using BobCAM or an idiot for forgetting to take into account such a basic detail. Or perhaps an idiot for not realizing BobCAM can do it but I just don't know how. Hard to imagine folks putting up with this much fuss and inefficiency in complex parts.
On the final part, the carbide spot drill broke, and so the drill made an off-center hole, and the tap broke in the hole. But why on earth would the spot drill break?
It broke because I forgot to set "arc slowdown" for the chamfer mill op. For that op, I like to plunge close to the hole center, with a 170 deg arc tangential lead-in. The arc traversed by the center of the cutter is very small - and so the effective feed rate where the cutting happens is some multiple of the programmed feed rate. For a reasonable chip load, the feed needs to be ~20% of the feed rate for a straight-line cut. So here I figure it was taking a .010" per tooth cut, thin ice, worked for ~40 holes but in the end was too much for a 1/4" cutter.
BobCAM even in its latest greatest version still provides no assistance for simple feed adjustments - you're expected to do the math manually based on the difference btw. the part edge radius and the programmed toolpath radius, and depending on the circumstances, either enter an arc slowdown %, or just enter a proportionately slower feed rate.
This is basic, the only problem is it was such a simple part, I forgot to do it.
Anyway, so how do the other basic / low end CAM packages address this? How far up the food chain do you have to buy before the CAM automatically calculates reasonable feed rates for arcs, in particular, with awareness of which side of the part line the cut is on? One of the reasons I think BobCAM does not do this is because it's generally stupid about which side of the part line the cut is on, i.e. not able to distinguish whether it's an increased feed rate because it's a convex feature, or a decreased feed for concave.
Having used no other CAM, hard to tell if I'm an idiot for using BobCAM or an idiot for forgetting to take into account such a basic detail. Or perhaps an idiot for not realizing BobCAM can do it but I just don't know how. Hard to imagine folks putting up with this much fuss and inefficiency in complex parts.