Not sure which you are looking for but when I use it for my 2 axis lathe their is a button that says "use canned cycles". Select that and instead of creating point to point moves it uses Gxx canned cycles. Don't remember specifically what for I only use them for threading as my Hyundai/Kia hates longhand threading code.
I was surprised that they didn't default to canned cycles but if you think about it it makes sense. The case for canned cycles is smaller programs that are easier and faster to write. On a 2 axis lathe that means the programs are 4k instead of 5k so really who cares. The other case is that it's much faster and easier to write canned programs manually. But your computer doesn't need the help. It isn't going to make bonehead mistakes or take forever to write code longhand.
But really these days other than people who don't want to learn a new skill and aren't under any kind of time constraint or just waiting to age out there is no good point to hand writing programs. The best person in the world takes ten times longer to write a program than a CAM person can create one.
The other more important reason I was given why it defaulted to long hand g code was that it removes the requirement for your controller to have to do computations in real time. They said that the cutting speed of modern machines was so fast now that having your controller taking time to compute code rather than just follow orders can cause all kinds of issues. Surface finish, slow down in feed at certain points, etc. It's just easier for the control to follow directions than do math.
Yes the fact that a lot of controls (*cough Fanuc) have the processing power of a first gen Atari and this wouldn't be as much of an issue with cell phone level processors but I have a 2017 mill that only has like 500k free memory after the factory loaded programs so it's not like they are trying to be cutting edge hardware wise.
In my experience Fusion will do pretty much whatever you want. You can make the code as bloated or sleek as you like, or at least as sleek as any other CAM system. Most of the bitching leveled at it seems to be more hate against Autodesk. I have to agree there, not that any other companies are any better.
Same with stability. Fusion gives some people issues. I get a crash about once a month so I am not one of them. But every other CAD/CAM software is just as bad if you are being honest.
