Chopped Up Finish - Indexable End Mill on AL
Close
Login to Your Account
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 35
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Country
    UNITED STATES
    State/Province
    California
    Posts
    61
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    24
    Likes (Received)
    1

    Default Chopped Up Finish - Indexable End Mill on AL

    Bought this end mill and these inserts to face a 1" wide surface, 6061. 1400SFM & IPT of 0.004" for an RPM of 4278 and a feed rate of 34ipm, DOC of only 0.01". Needless to say, the results were not as anticipated. I'm fairly new to machining, so it wouldn't surprise me if I had the inserts backwards or something ridiculous (I don't really think I have the inserts backwards ). WTF!

    em1.jpg
    em2.jpg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Country
    UNITED STATES
    State/Province
    Arizona
    Posts
    1,169
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    107
    Likes (Received)
    470

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sdinzy View Post
    Bought this end mill and these inserts to face a 1" wide surface, 6061. 1400SFM & IPT of 0.004" for an RPM of 4278 and a feed rate of 34ipm, DOC of only 0.01". Needless to say, the results were not as anticipated. I'm fairly new to machining, so it wouldn't surprise me if I had the inserts backwards or something ridiculous (I don't really think I have the inserts backwards ). WTF!

    em1.jpg
    em2.jpg
    Aside from the tool being a POS your set up is the main problem. its not rigid

  3. Likes Bobw, Dualkit, PegroProX440, Bluejeep, Mtndew and 2 others liked this post
  4. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Country
    UNITED STATES
    State/Province
    California
    Posts
    61
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    24
    Likes (Received)
    1

    Default

    I thought it might be the workholding. I would agree the tool was cheap. Ok so final verdict is workholding?

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Country
    UNITED STATES MINOR OUTLYING ISLANDS
    Posts
    6,110
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2929

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sdinzy View Post
    I thought it might be the workholding. I would agree the tool was cheap. Ok so final verdict is workholding?
    That and those inserts. C'mon, just a regular nose radius is fine. Big broad contact surface like that is going to create problems for anything but a perfect setup.

  6. Likes Bobw, Illinoyance liked this post
  7. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Country
    UNITED STATES
    State/Province
    California
    Posts
    61
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    24
    Likes (Received)
    1

    Default

    Honestly I don't know anything about inserts. Please educate me.

  8. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,249
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    1089

    Default

    So I am no machinist either, but I can tell you that a flat faced insert like that is going to push off like crazy and if the part isn't absolutely ridid you'll get what you gotten. Use a nice new dead sharp end mill and you'll get much better results. It's aluminum and you will likely break it from stupid long before you wear it out. A smaller tool won't push as hard either so it will reduce the rigidity problem.

  9. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Hatch, NM Chile capital of the WORLD
    Posts
    9,457
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    15667
    Likes (Received)
    11410

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sdinzy View Post
    Honestly I don't know anything about inserts. Please educate me.
    If its a TPG.. DO NOT buy it. Quite honestly, they should be outlawed. 1960's left over
    garbage that even most home shop harry's won't even use anymore. Flat top, no geometry,
    just garbage.

    And if you paid anywhere near those prices, you got gang raped. But.. That is MSC's standard
    operating procedure.

    Even a standard APKT (80's technology) will work far better.

    1 INCH APKT END MILL

    And I'll agree, to get that kind of chatter, your work holding had to be sketchy.


    Learning experiences. Aren't they great?

  10. Likes Jashley73, Illinoyance liked this post
  11. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Hillsboro, New Hampshire
    Posts
    10,963
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    2560
    Likes (Received)
    7711

    Default

    That style of insert cutter is essentially the worst thing you can use aside from bolting rocks (well, pebbles) to holder and trying them.

    But forget that for a moment, you need to show us (in the machine) how you were holding the part.

  12. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    poulsbo, wa, usa
    Posts
    1,099
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    86
    Likes (Received)
    472

    Default

    shear hogs from ABtools.com or Ripper mills from Latheinserts.com

    I run both and have for years on alum with great luck ,, but I well say with the finish your getting it has to be a bad setup as much as wrong tooling for the material.

    I have also had good luck with the cheap-O face mills from Latheinserts.com ,, he has some alum inserts that seem to hold up for months and you cant go wrong on them for like $7 each ,,, I have one mill setup on a nonstop production part and its been a year on the same inserts and the finish it still holding ...

  13. Likes Bluejeep liked this post
  14. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Beaverdam, Virginia
    Posts
    9,460
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    1275
    Likes (Received)
    4882

    Default

    Like others said, post a picture of your set-up. It looks like you had something that would flex and vibrate like crazy, even with the proper tool. I could not image the noise it was making.

  15. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Country
    UNITED STATES
    State/Province
    California
    Posts
    61
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    24
    Likes (Received)
    1

    Default

    Hi Guys, Thank you for all the responses. The workholding itself is actually fine (5th Axis dovetail fixture), itís just that due to the order of operations, the remaining extrusion supporting the part being faced provides very little rigidity; I can easily change the facing operation to occur much earlier in the process. *The sound actually wasnít bad, relatively*

    In regards to the inserts, thank you all for the wisdom. I tried researching inserts to the Nth degree prior to purchasing, but it just doesnít seem to be a topic you can read about online. If any of you can recommend a product or type of product in order to point me in the right direction, I would greatly appreciate it! I donít necessarily need a mirror finish, but the current finish wonít work ;-)

  16. #12
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    South Central PA
    Posts
    14,242
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    2641
    Likes (Received)
    3967

    Default

    +1 to throw that tool away, they weren't very good when they were young, and now they are antiques.
    No one has mentioned edge prep. Since the grade is listed as C5/C6 whatever that really means, it's probably a generic grade intended for steel, so it probably has a honed edge. Search here for edge prep for more explanation. An aluminum insert usually has a dead sharp edge with no honing, honing will make aluminum smear and will make an otherwise good cut very ugly, and make the part push away, and cause build up on the edge of the insert which makes even more trouble.
    +1 on the ripper mills from latheinserts.com, they are more than worth the investment.

  17. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Country
    UNITED STATES
    State/Province
    Georgia
    Posts
    800
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    9
    Likes (Received)
    176

    Default

    You are better off with a Chinese $40 apkt insert mill. I have never used anything with those old school inserts and Iím pretty impressed that you were able to buy them. You own a modern looking 5 axis machine. Sounds like you have some decent $$$ try calling a tooling rep for whatever brand you want.

  18. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Country
    UNITED STATES MINOR OUTLYING ISLANDS
    Posts
    6,110
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2929

    Default

    If you don't feel like throwing it away, get a box of cheap inserts that have a normal nose radius, instead of those wide flats. Standard old TPG-322 or something. Uncoated.

    Yeah, it's not a great tool but if you hold the part so it doesn't shake rattle and roll, and use an insert with a standard nose radius so the contact patch is small, you should be able to make it work.

  19. Likes Perry Harrington liked this post
  20. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Country
    UNITED STATES
    State/Province
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,439
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    968
    Likes (Received)
    1443

    Default

    Looks like you have a 4 maybe 5 axis mill? I'd try machining that surface with the side of an endmill.
    You might get a little funkiness at the beginning and end of the cut, but once the tool is into the cut it stays engaged. Not like the constant pounding it's getting from that inserted tool.

  21. Likes Bobw liked this post
  22. #16
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Country
    UNITED STATES
    State/Province
    Michigan
    Posts
    2,433
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    1265
    Likes (Received)
    1797

    Default

    Try Ingersoll's HiPos Alu line. They have a crowned back to keep the inserts seated at high speeds and a sharp polished cutting edge. They will make that TPG tool look like Stone Age technology.

  23. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Country
    UNITED STATES
    State/Province
    California
    Posts
    61
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    24
    Likes (Received)
    1

    Default

    Thank you Chip! It sucks buying stone age $hit not even knowing it was stone age $hit, but all part of the process I guess.

  24. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    5,458
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    5119
    Likes (Received)
    3429

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sdinzy View Post

    In regards to the inserts, thank you all for the wisdom. I tried researching inserts to the Nth degree prior to purchasing, but it just doesnít seem to be a topic you can read about online. If any of you can recommend a product or type of product in order to point me in the right direction, I would greatly appreciate it! I donít necessarily need a mirror finish, but the current finish wonít work ;-)
    Go to all of the big name websites and download their literature or have them ship you a physical copy of their books.
    Sandvik,Iscar, Kennametal, Mitsubishi Carbide, Seco,Garr, etc... they all have info on their tooling and their recommendations.

  25. #19
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Country
    UNITED STATES
    State/Province
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,459
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    671
    Likes (Received)
    867

    Default

    Despite the tool being a far less than optimal geometry it is capable of producing a far better finish than that. Something is loosey goosey. Likely the part but maybe something else. Hard to tell without more pics.

  26. Likes Bobw, Perry Harrington liked this post
  27. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Country
    LATVIA
    Posts
    659
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    179
    Likes (Received)
    368

    Default

    how about showing how the part was held down? that end mill, even with "no geometry", cannot be solely responsible for that result

  28. Likes Bobw liked this post

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •