What's new
What's new

How would you machine this?

mteiken

Plastic
Joined
Feb 12, 2016
This is a barrel extension from an MG42 machine gun. I was looking at this and wondered - how was the interior machined? Anyone have any idea?

roller_grooves.jpg
roller_grooves_close.jpg
 
Looks fairly straight forward. But I'm not the one holding the part.

I'm guessing you're after what looks like a curved face in there, that's not millable?

In ascending order of likelyhood:
3d printed
EDM'd
5 axis milled
Klaus's hammer and chisel
Special built machine. Possibly a shaper of some sort.
 
Looks fairly straight forward. But I'm not the one holding the part.

I'm guessing you're after what looks like a curved face in there, that's not millable?

In ascending order of likelyhood:
3d printed
EDM'd
5 axis milled
Klaus's hammer and chisel
Special built machine. Possibly a shaper of some sort.

Hm for something built in the 40s I think a couple of those didn’t exist and others not plausible. Was probably done with a special cutter on a jig in a conventional milling machine
 
I can see from the outside where it hasn't been milled that it is a forged piece. I wonder if they could have made those grooves during the forging process.
 
We have a faro scanner for parts like that. Scan it make a mesh file and either 3d print it or load it into fusion 360 or some other cam system and machine the part with a ball nose. I may be missing something but doesn't look too difficult as long as you can machine in 3 axis.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
That looks pretty straight forward from what I can see. I don't have a mg-42 handy for reference.

There were any number of profile machines capable of what we consider "complex" machining today. Many times it was a VERY simple setup, with custom cutters, on a dedicated machine for that operation. Remember these guns were made in masse, on specialized machines with specialized tooling, not on general purpose machines with general purpose tooling like most shops have today.

So to answer your question, I would do some research and see what historical data is available, I would solid model it, and set it up in my Brother and machine it. Problem is, they are super cheap... so other than curiosity...

and machine the part with a ball nose. I may be missing something but doesn't look too difficult as long as you can machine in 3 axis

You can't machine it 3 axis because the upper arm is blocking your access with a ball nose endmill.

This might help:
MG3 MG42 Barrel Extension, Trunnion, German Surplus, MGG-1768, RTG Parts
 
Difficult to get a clear mental picture of that (for me). Is a larger photo possible?

Since the polygon rifling through hammer-forging was developed in Germany, and the M42 was a "low-cost" weapon of the day, I'd be willing to bet that all (or at least most) of it was "formed". Stamped, punched, etc. Apparently 423,000 of these guns were made (and I suspect a *LOT* of extra barrels), so I'd seriously doubt if there was much machining going on.


PM
 
Ohh I think I was reading your post wrong. You dont need one just wondering how it was made?


Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Difficult to get a clear mental picture of that (for me). Is a larger photo possible?

Since the polygon rifling through hammer-forging was developed in Germany, and the M42 was a "low-cost" weapon of the day, I'd be willing to bet that all (or at least most) of it was "formed". Stamped, punched, etc. Apparently 423,000 of these guns were made (and I suspect a *LOT* of extra barrels), so I'd seriously doubt if there was much machining going on.


PM

You might be amazed how much machining Mauser was doing right up to USGI's rolling in the doors.

Mauser was a worldwide leader in nearly all metal working processes, from forging, stamping, metallurgy, machinery, cutters, heat treat, grinding. Even many wood processes for their stocks, lamination and glue were far beyond US and Allied capabilities.

Now it is true, that many of their forgings were, I believe the modern term is "near net", which meant VERY little machining was needed.

By 43/44 if I remember right, Mauser had transitioned to primarily focusing on anti air craft guns. The list of machines used for that contract is LONG and VERY impressive.

Here is one of FIFTEEN pages of machines dedicated to the 1940 contract for the Flak 38 produced by Mauser. These machines were not permitted to be used for anything but the contracted work.
P1120844.jpg

(from Jon Speed's Collection)
 
I may be dense but from what I'd see you'd just drill holes from the side for the round grooves, then rough it out from above and then throw a suitable T-slot mill in the mix to get the result?
 








 
Back
Top