Not arguing against the Genos M560 one bit.
If however, you need automation and wanted it single sourced with one PO and one service contact you could look at this guy:
https://www.gfms.com/content/dam/gfms/pdf/milling/3-axis-milling/mill-p/en/mikron-mill-p-900_en.pdf
Very similar in design and I think it's competitive when looking at automation packages. Pretty cool having the pallets come in from the back, through the columns.
Ok I am weak - you have weakened my resolve...
3 axis bridge wall machine made of synthetic granite.
Machine looks almost sexy.
Better than a 3 axis hermle.
How much , base model for garnitan mold machine ? (any idea ?)
BTW OP kinda said "Normal machine Tolerances"
But I'm curious vs Makino F3/F5 and V33i.
__________________________________________________________
Fundamentally the Genos M 560V is a heavier machine and the CMX 1100V is a lighter machine ~ Personally think the CMX 1100V is a very clever design for its weight class.
CMX 1100V is 12,100 lbs and the Okuma Genos M 560V is 18,293 lbs (according to my math) ,
So not really in the same class at all.
If I was going to say something +ve for the CMX 1100V is scales as standard , the (optional) DD drive 4th axis rotary clamps really accurately to 5 arc seconds positions to 3 arc seconds. CMX 1100V has 20K rpm spindle option and roller guide trucks and linear bearings with "X" ( > < ) formation vs. ball bearing linear slides and trucks on the Genos. The CMX 1100V seems like a "Nerdier" machine and lighter than the Okuma Genos M 560V. Not sure how floor space compares ?
It's odd to me that the decision would go down to M560V vs. CMX100V as if you really want a M560V "Peeps" just do that, and if you really want a CMX 1100V "Peeps" just dooooo that.
+ 60 tools and various automation options. (supposedly turn key).
I guess it's an either - OR in Op's case 'cuz they cost about the same ?
The Genos will pretty much last forever.