josephk
Aluminum
- Joined
- May 16, 2018
- Location
- Hudson Valley NY
Has anyone ran a comparison between the Schunk and the Sandvik hydraulic holders?
Schunk has a good deal going on now, buy 4 get one free but i can get the sandvik for cheaper with a tooling certificate.
Schunk only offers the Tendo E compact in the big-plus interface.
This is the info i got.
Both have 2 hydraulic bands that are clamping,
Sandvik has a option for a anti pullout sleeve which should make it pullout resistant similar to sidelock,
Schunk claims "up to" 900 Nm clamping for the 3/4" holder while the Sandvik is rated at "Min" 370 Nm for the 20mm holder,
Schunk tightens to a hard stop while the sandvik requires a torque wrench,
The short schunk is 2.5" gage length the short sandvik is 3.2" gage length,
Nose diameter 1.5" for the schunk 2.165" for the sandvik,
It seems like the schunk is superior in every aspect besides the pullout protection? what about real world tests?
Thank you
Schunk has a good deal going on now, buy 4 get one free but i can get the sandvik for cheaper with a tooling certificate.
Schunk only offers the Tendo E compact in the big-plus interface.
This is the info i got.
Both have 2 hydraulic bands that are clamping,
Sandvik has a option for a anti pullout sleeve which should make it pullout resistant similar to sidelock,
Schunk claims "up to" 900 Nm clamping for the 3/4" holder while the Sandvik is rated at "Min" 370 Nm for the 20mm holder,
Schunk tightens to a hard stop while the sandvik requires a torque wrench,
The short schunk is 2.5" gage length the short sandvik is 3.2" gage length,
Nose diameter 1.5" for the schunk 2.165" for the sandvik,
It seems like the schunk is superior in every aspect besides the pullout protection? what about real world tests?
Thank you