there are standards in die/punch selection.
Example the 911/904 setup I use gives a nice tight bend with 18 ga material.
The die is 3/8 between tips, the punch has a .031 tip
You could use a die with a 1" wide opening, same .031 tip punch and bend 18 also, except the radius will be very large.
Dies may be chosen by the required flange length needed, you couldn't make a 1/4 " lip on the material using a 1" wide die.
The wider the die the less tonnage per foot required to make the bend. a 3/8 die, .031 tip punch is about 3 tons per foot, as I said before. Using a 3/4" wide die the tonnage drops to around 1.4 per foot.
So...........you ask again about consistency.
It all the brake, not the tooling. It doesn't make any difference if you have a 3/8 die or 1/2 die, the travel of the ram must be the same to produce like parts, with air bending or coining.
Air bending the brake must stop at the same point, coining, the brake must produce the same pressure.
if the brake cannot repeat itself you will never get like parts.
As you mentioned one guy said to use a 90 deg setup, fine, except the brake must be able to "push" the same every time or the angle will be different.
Need to edit my previous post(was watching TV) bottom bending will take about 4 times the tonnage, coining about 10 times.
So your 30 ton brake isn't going to bottom bend 55" (3 tons ft x 4=12 tons ft ///12x4.58=54 tons)
Everyone has an opinion, mine would be to air bend.
read this
http://archive.metalformingmagazine.com/1998/03/Hurco/hurc.htm