Anyone heard of invertabolt?
Close
Login to Your Account
Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    8
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Post

    I would be interested if anyone has some feedback on the use of invertabolt? Do they work good? What you use them for, etc?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Benton, IL USA
    Posts
    4,567
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    7
    Likes (Received)
    44

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Salem, OR, USA
    Posts
    361
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1

    Post

    Just one more smartass answer;
    If you invert a bolt wouldn't ya have a nut?
    lg
    no neat sig line

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Silicon Valley, California... + other states & several countries on 3 continents
    Posts
    2,100
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    38

    Post

    They work great. The trickiest part is finding a spot to run the thread into. But even that can be worked around with changing stock size, etc.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    suburbs of Ann Arbor, MI, USA
    Posts
    13,038
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    423
    Likes (Received)
    1011

    Post

    That would be OK for planer or shaper work where the clamps get in the way. Better than toe-clamps IMHO as the part is directly bolted down.

    I expect the hole centers have to be spot-on though.

    -Matt

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Silicon Valley, California... + other states & several countries on 3 continents
    Posts
    2,100
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    38

    Post

    I expect the hole centers have to be spot-on though.
    No they don't, thats the beauty of it. They have some range of movement to compensate.


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Thomasville, GA
    Posts
    1,562
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    6

    Post

    Anybody got a picture of one in pieces so we can see how they are made?

    It looks like they would have several rather sloppy threads in the insert and on the part that comes up. That would give you some leeway on getting the holes in exactly the right position.

    At some point the sloppy threads have to disengage, and there must be a shoulder on the part that comes up so it can develop some clamping force as you continue to turn it into the workpiece.

    The only downside I see is that you'd have some partially tapped holes in your workpiece after you're done.

    Roger

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    suburbs of Ann Arbor, MI, USA
    Posts
    13,038
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    423
    Likes (Received)
    1011

    Post

    Thanks Roger, I knew something wasn't "quite right" in my mental concept. The thread forms have to kind of converge to develop some clamping force.

    Unless as you suggest the bottom thread is merely a "jack" to get the top thread started, then a flange allows load to be developed.

    -Matt

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Asheville NC USA
    Posts
    8,963
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    3473
    Likes (Received)
    3000

    Post

    Seems as if the clamping stud would have to be spring loaded from below and not actually threaded into the piece it rides in. Otherwise it would tend to push the part up until the beginning of the thread on the stud came around to the proper angular orientation to engage the tapped hole in the part. If the stud had a finer pitch on the lower portion than on the section which goes into the part, then it could develop the clamping force via the differential movement of the two threads, but that would still mean it would push the part upward until it engaged the thread in the tapped hole.

    If you watch the videos, it would seem there are some parts that this setup would be useful for, but with the necessity to drill and tap multiple holes plus the requirement to drill and ream dowel holes for the actual location of the stock, it looks to me as if its a thing you'd only want to use when nothing simpler would work.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Thomasville, GA
    Posts
    1,562
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    6

    Post

    "If the stud had a finer pitch on the lower portion than on the section which goes into the part"...

    Different threads--I hadn't thought of that.

    Thanks!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Beaumont, TX, USA
    Posts
    4,380
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    146
    Likes (Received)
    1211

    Post

    Larry_g said,

    "Just one more smartass answer;
    If you invert a bolt wouldn't ya have a nut?"

    No, it's a "tlob".


    Paul A.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Beaumont, TX, USA
    Posts
    4,380
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    146
    Likes (Received)
    1211

    Post

    Looks ingenious to me. Obviously a differental thread pitch provides the hold-down force. And a CNC machine could be provided with an Allen tool to do the fastening and unfastening so the operator would only have to place the part on the studs and remove it after it's done.

    I doubt that I will ever use it but, you never know.

    Paul A.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    8
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Post

    Thaks for the feedback. I appreciate your help.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Wichita, Kansas
    Posts
    2
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Post

    Metlmuchr,
    The beauty of the Invert-A-Bolt we found at Cessna is that you can make a universal type fixture and run many, many parts over the same tool. In fact, 90% of the dedicated tools at Cessna were eliminated with this concept. Granted, you need to tab or picture frame your part, but that is a small cost compared to the savings in tooing, storage, maintenance and retrieval, plus, your bolts are ALWAYS right there.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Douglass, KS, USA
    Posts
    111
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Post

    The concept the Invertabolt is based on was first seen in the aircraft industry around the '80s. It was a homemade version made from a set screw welded to a washer with a pusher spring under it. The old LTV (now Vought) has been given credit by some, but I don't know.

    Several aircraft companies have used variations of them. I'm not sure when invertabolt came out with their version but they work very well. I know at least one company that does almost all of their flat plate work on universal grid plates using these alternating with bushed holes. I believe Invertabolt or sombody else now sells plates similar to these.

    One of the really great advantages to these things is the small footprint. With practice ( & a little guts) you learn to program cutter paths close to them &, since there is no bolt head, over the top of them.

    bigrog, if you know Phil Simpson or Dennis Schroeder in NC Programming at Cessna (if they're still there) tell them hi from Jim Malia. Also, tell'em today's my last day at RAC & I start back at Bonex tommorow.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Wichita, Kansas
    Posts
    2
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Post

    Malia,
    Jim, good luck back at "The Big Bummer Factory",(WWII terminology) better known lately as the Lazy B Ranch. What a great place to be away from.


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
2