-
02-22-2021, 04:03 AM #21
-
-
02-22-2021, 06:23 AM #22
it will deform but not in any relevant way for this application. in induction hardening you vary the deph of the case by the frequency used. 4340 should through harden, but ductility might be impared by a coarse grain structure.
how did you come up with 205 ksi? maybe you should be looking at yield instead.
edit: annealed does not give best hardening results, are you sure its annealed?. you should have hardened and tempered.Last edited by dian; 02-22-2021 at 10:12 AM.
-
02-22-2021, 10:09 AM #23
-
02-22-2021, 11:15 AM #24
-
02-22-2021, 11:23 AM #25
i would stay with what you have. what is the diameter? 1"? 4340T (hardened and tempered) is about 23 hrc. just saying. have it induction hardened and test it with at least double load.
there are of course cheaper and stronger steels that, however, require an "industrial" heat treat.
-
-
02-22-2021, 11:37 AM #26
-
02-22-2021, 12:44 PM #27
-
02-22-2021, 01:03 PM #28
Any steel with the same cross sectional properties will bend the same amount when you apply the same load. There will be slight variation in E (youngs modulus)) so the deflection could vary a very small amount with different materials.
The difference though is that as the yield strength increases the deflection increases before it yields.
If you really wanted to figure out the yield strength required, you would need the max end weight that's going to used, the position of the knurls (so you can calculate the bending moments) the diameter of the bar (from which you calculate I (second moment of area)), Using those 2 pieces of information you could calculate the bending stress with the max weight at the ends.
So if you calculate a bending stress of 100ksi, and the organisation requires a factor of safety of 1.5, then the yield strength (NOT tensile strength) of the material needs to 150ksi.
Using E (youngs modulus) you can calculate deflection.
For s&g's you could look for pictures of weightlifters lifting large weights, if you knew the diameter of the bar, the distance between the weights, if the picture is clear enough that you can estimate deflection you could figure out the min yield strength req'd
-
02-22-2021, 01:11 PM #29
-
-
02-22-2021, 01:15 PM #30
Induction hardening will be fine. Flame hardening will also work. Both will probably cause deformation. Straighten the bar afterward if necessary. Many hardening shops can do this if you can't.
-
02-22-2021, 01:54 PM #31
-
02-22-2021, 02:02 PM #32
-
02-22-2021, 02:23 PM #33
If he really wants 53HRC, I would worry about the knurling acting a stress riser for fatigue cracks. How about a rubber sleeve for grip?
Much safer to use a thicker bar at a lower, tougher and more ductile hardness level. Turn the ends down if necessary to fit the holes in the standard weights.
For teat-treat, surely somebody makes heavy-truck axle shafts, or torsion-bars, in Pakistan? Their material as well as their processs is what I would look at.
-
02-22-2021, 02:31 PM #34
-
02-22-2021, 02:33 PM #35
-
02-22-2021, 03:00 PM #36
Why re-invent the wheel??? With a weight lifting club in the ‘70’s we had York olympic style bars that were 6150 (good for high $$$ springs). Those bars were chrome plated for corrosion.
The club in Moline had some Swedish made bars that were a stainless steel & those were plated too. I can’t imagine anybody building a free weight bar on the cheap. If you are talking about just a bare bar without the rotating ends then maybe yes & they don't need to be 7 foot long either…
Attached some 6150 data from EMJ. (on edit) the mass effect page doesn't show 205K tensile but tempering at 925F will get to your 205K tensile.
Good luck,
MattLast edited by Matt_Maguire; 02-22-2021 at 03:06 PM. Reason: Add data
-
02-23-2021, 06:02 AM #37
if we are getting into different alloys, axles are often made out of 1541. apparently it takes bending loads better that 4340.
-
02-24-2021, 03:24 AM #38
-
02-24-2021, 03:50 AM #39
maybe 43 hrc would make more sense and trying to have a deep case/through harden done?
Bookmarks