ttrager
Cast Iron
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2015
- Location
- East Side / Detroit
Yes, I'm being a crybaby this morning. Haven't had my coffee yet.
DIM: ".2813 +.001 / +.0015". Therefore, .2813 means nothing to the part feature. .2823 is the LOW, .2828 is the HIGH. .28205 is median.
We re-stated the DIM and tolerance differently on our reprint, and it got past our re-printing review because in the moment brain-translations did the math wrong, between two people.
Our shop foreman has his own policy of reprinting, so that's not going away (stated because others here have mentioned in the past stop reprinting).
I'm annoyed. Annoyed two of us MISSED this on our reprint (caught in time, job OK). But I'm also annoyed that a physical DIM statement on a blueprint baselines to nothing unless you math the whacky tolerance to find What the DIM is actually supposed to be. .2813 actually is not the DIM.
Is there some esoteric Voodoo I'm noobishly ignorant of that suggests it is good practice to state a DIM and Tolerance like this?
/pre coffee crying over
DIM: ".2813 +.001 / +.0015". Therefore, .2813 means nothing to the part feature. .2823 is the LOW, .2828 is the HIGH. .28205 is median.
We re-stated the DIM and tolerance differently on our reprint, and it got past our re-printing review because in the moment brain-translations did the math wrong, between two people.
Our shop foreman has his own policy of reprinting, so that's not going away (stated because others here have mentioned in the past stop reprinting).
I'm annoyed. Annoyed two of us MISSED this on our reprint (caught in time, job OK). But I'm also annoyed that a physical DIM statement on a blueprint baselines to nothing unless you math the whacky tolerance to find What the DIM is actually supposed to be. .2813 actually is not the DIM.
Is there some esoteric Voodoo I'm noobishly ignorant of that suggests it is good practice to state a DIM and Tolerance like this?
/pre coffee crying over