What's better Linear Ways or Scraped Ways ?
Close
Login to Your Account
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 23
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cottage Grove, MN 55016
    Posts
    7,684
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    4128
    Likes (Received)
    4575

    Default What's better Linear Ways or Scraped Ways ?

    I figure the forum needs a new subject. Here is a magazine article I contributed too back in 2015.

    Scrape to the point | Cutting Tool Engineering

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    near Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
    Posts
    5,541
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    441
    Likes (Received)
    2070

    Default

    They did not mention hydrostatic ways.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Hillsboro, New Hampshire
    Posts
    7,834
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    1828
    Likes (Received)
    5508

    Default

    The ultimate must be scraped linear ways, with flaking on all the rolling elements and rails.


  4. Likes lucky7 liked this post
  5. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Bremerton WA USA
    Posts
    10,699
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    41
    Likes (Received)
    4282

    Default

    Good survey article apparently intended for design staff and supervision unfamiliar with the comparative merits of linear bearing systems.

    While the article couldn't cover everything (hydrostatic bearings, alternative lining materials, machine tool survey, buy Vs build, prep for rebuild, etc), it omitted scraping assembly joints for correcting alignment and scraping bearing surfaces for geometry and fit. A good tech writer could have synopsized these sub-topics in a single paragraph - enough to plant a nugget in the mind of a technical decision maker.

    Most folks with only a vague knowledge of scraping are unaware its niche applications, including accurizing the mounting surfaces intended for linear bearing assemblies. It would be beneficial if the decision makers were at least aware of these refinements and of source material, bibliographies, etc for further study should they be so inclined.

  6. Likes cyanidekid liked this post
  7. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Flushing/Flint, Michigan
    Posts
    8,101
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    414
    Likes (Received)
    6687

    Default

    People hand scrape linear bearing mount surfaces or even bearing locknuts...

  8. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Country
    UNITED KINGDOM
    Posts
    2,885
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1343

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RC99 View Post
    They did not mention hydrostatic ways.
    Landis cam grinders have the kind that are pressurized. Is that hydrostatic or hydrodynamic ?

    Whichever, they are the coolest. Makes everything else look like junk.

  9. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Surbiton, surrey, UK
    Posts
    1,636
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    2016
    Likes (Received)
    1051

    Default

    Obviously, the correct answer is the one wot Richard says!

  10. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Hillsboro, New Hampshire
    Posts
    7,834
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    1828
    Likes (Received)
    5508

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EmanuelGoldstein View Post
    Landis cam grinders have the kind that are pressurized. Is that hydrostatic or hydrodynamic ?

    Whichever, they are the coolest. Makes everything else look like junk.
    It's a little counterintuitive, but hydrostatic is pressure fed, hydrodynamic is when the movement of the mechanical elements induces a lubrication wedge between bearing surfaces.

  11. Likes Lurk, cyanidekid liked this post
  12. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma City, OK
    Posts
    4,573
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    790
    Likes (Received)
    1885

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Milland View Post
    It's a little counterintuitive, but hydrostatic is pressure fed, hydrodynamic is when the movement of the mechanical elements induces a lubrication wedge between bearing surfaces.
    My mnemonic is that hydrostatic is pressure fed as a way to keep static pressure.

    Quote Originally Posted by Forrest Addy View Post
    Good survey article apparently intended for design staff and supervision unfamiliar with the comparative merits of linear bearing systems.

    While the article couldn't cover everything (hydrostatic bearings, alternative lining materials, machine tool survey, buy Vs build, prep for rebuild, etc), it omitted scraping assembly joints for correcting alignment and scraping bearing surfaces for geometry and fit. A good tech writer could have synopsized these sub-topics in a single paragraph - enough to plant a nugget in the mind of a technical decision maker.

    Most folks with only a vague knowledge of scraping are unaware its niche applications, including accurizing the mounting surfaces intended for linear bearing assemblies. It would be beneficial if the decision makers were at least aware of these refinements and of source material, bibliographies, etc for further study should they be so inclined.
    Damn glad to see you around, Forrest!

  13. Likes Lurk, rklopp, cyanidekid liked this post
  14. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    5,853
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    280
    Likes (Received)
    1511

    Default

    Isn`t the development in tooling dictating linear ways ???

    Peter

  15. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Country
    UNITED STATES
    State/Province
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,081
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    1116
    Likes (Received)
    946

    Default

    Application Specific.

    Do you need a robust machine to take heavy cuts.

    Or a fast light duty machine to lay carbon fiber.

    Kind of like on Saturday morning, you would like a pick up truck to take yard wast to the dump, but then Saturday night you would like a sports car to go out and chase the ladies, or dudes......

  16. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    missouri
    Posts
    220
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    86
    Likes (Received)
    59

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter from Holland View Post
    Isn`t the development in tooling dictating linear ways ???

    Peter
    that's an interesting thought. or could it be that since linear ways are becoming more prevalent, that cutting tool design is being optimized for use on machines with linear ways to take advantage of the advantages of those way systems and to minimize the disadvantages of them.

  17. Likes Derek Smalls liked this post
  18. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Peoria, IL
    Posts
    11,736
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    51
    Likes (Received)
    8988

    Default

    The best and biggest names in machine tools still use a mix of both. Mazak is entirely linear guides as far as I know. But Okuma uses box ways on the lathes and linear guides on the mills. Similar for Mori Seiki.

    Some companies like Doosan use box ways as a selling point claiming rigidity. Others like Brother use linear ways using speed as a selling point.

    I think we will see both for years to come.

  19. Likes cash, Richard King, Paolo_MD liked this post
  20. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma City, OK
    Posts
    4,573
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    790
    Likes (Received)
    1885

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ewlsey View Post
    I think we will see both for years to come.
    ...horses for courses.

  21. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    barcelona, spain
    Posts
    2,407
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    541
    Likes (Received)
    1440

    Default

    Imo,
    Linear guides are taking over, eventually accounting for most-all typical contact-bearing machine tool uses.
    I believe linear guides are 90% of machine tool ways, in 2019, by new machines made in units.

    I doubt any manually scraped contact surfaces in machine tools will be relevant in 10 years, == 2029.
    Machine-ground surfaces similar to todays scraped surfaces might be used in some very specialty apps by 2029.

    Clar(ification):
    I did not belittle the scraping skills and quality and results achieved here by many in PM in many cases, at all.

    I just opined that it will not be commercially relevant past maybe 1(-2)% or less of cases, by 2029.

  22. Likes Richard King, scraper liked this post
  23. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Medina OH
    Posts
    2,011
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    188
    Likes (Received)
    938

    Default

    The added benefit of the linear ways is the comparatively lightning fast rebuild time.

    That is one of the reasons I bought a Brother.

    Don’t get me wrong, I learned scraping to rebuild some of my old machinery, and I am a rank amateur, but it takes FOREVER comparatively.

  24. Likes Richard King, Paolo_MD liked this post
  25. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Manchester, England
    Posts
    8,439
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    1249
    Likes (Received)
    5378

    Default

    Another vote for a well designed hydrostatic system.

    Regards Tyrone.

  26. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    5,853
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    280
    Likes (Received)
    1511

    Default

    Perhaps linear motors will take over
    Do these have seperate ways BTW ??

    Peter

  27. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Hillsboro, New Hampshire
    Posts
    7,834
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    1828
    Likes (Received)
    5508

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter from Holland View Post
    Perhaps linear motors will take over
    Do these have seperate ways BTW ??

    Peter
    So far the linear motors I've seen just provide propulsive force, not axis direction or stability. So they've using linear rails to provide that.

    Now in theory they should be able to do both, but the force required to be stable in all six axis while under cutter load or movement directive would likely be energy prohibitive, unless we got a practical superconductor for the drives.

  28. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Flushing/Flint, Michigan
    Posts
    8,101
    Post Thanks / Like
    Likes (Given)
    414
    Likes (Received)
    6687

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter from Holland View Post
    Perhaps linear motors will take over
    Do these have seperate ways BTW ??

    Peter
    Yes separate and in bigger sizes they do not like box or conventional ways due to huge attraction force which will clamp down these type setups.
    Bob


Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •