What's new
What's new

0t---building the Chinese Type-15

Or Lafayette Square in DC...

Something's wrong when we can accurately compare a US president to the Chinese Communist Party.

Can't see it as "accurate" at all.

CCP is odious, but effective. They got what they paid for. A stolen election that will cause turmoil for really LONG years!

They didn't EXPECT Quid-Pro-Beijing-Joe to to be competent OR a good follower.

They are just as well-off he simply f**ks up the USA and undoes all the progress made by his predecessor. Starting-off by being caught in wrongdoing. Of his own. For-real. Not something Hillary paid to have invented.

Obama called it, didn't he? "Never underestimate Joe's ability to f**k things up."

That way, CCP doesn't take the blame.

WE do!
 
Sleepy joe won't be around long, Commi harris will be running the show with soros telling her what to do.
And the lizard people ! Dangitall, why do you guys keep shortchanging the lizard people !

Anyway, why do they even make tanks these days ? It's not 1945 no more. I s'pose they are okay for invading Grenada, but against an armed adversary ? what for ?
 
Sleepy joe won't be around long, Commi harris will be running the show with soros telling her what to do.

Wait! Aren't there others you're missing? Where's the Bill Gates vaccines with RFID's? Where's the dead Venezuelan leader who hacked the voting machines? And don't forget the Green Party which swapped Rudy's hair dye for crude oil!

Geez, Moonlight - did you enjoy hanging around with cheaters and losers in the racing biz? Then why pal around with their equivalent in politics? And Soros? Is that really the way you think?
 
Sleepy joe won't be around long, Commi harris will be running the show with soros telling her what to do.

You are probably correct about Joe not lasting long. OTOH, if Harris gets the job after Joe loses the rest of his mind, she isn't really presidential quality. When she was in California, she had about as much tact as a bear trap.

We shall see.
 
At 1:51 of the video, while standing up outside the commander's hatch where she's bouncing about at speed, notice the hatch isn't even locked open. Basic accident Ready-to-Go! Troops probably know better, but Let's hope there are no locks on those and they all lose their teeth - and better, their noggins. To think we probably halved the time it took them to develop much of that sort of stuff by sharing (giving) so much tech, all for mutual prosperity. Bad gamble.

"halved the time?" Type 15 is an upgraded design from 1953!

Only China's own civilians need to worry about the PLA's Army, Navy, and Air Force.

"World's largest open-air Military Museum" as to hardware.

Leadership that only knows how to make commercials and profit economically whilst getting their ass-kicked by the Vietnamese.. or anybody else who cares enough to be bothered.

Whom have they exported weapons to who has won THEIR war ?

:D
 
Leadership that only knows how to make commercials and profit economically whilst getting their ass-kicked by the Vietnamese.. or anybody else who cares enough to be bothered.
Which makes a laughingstock of all those "We need to beef up the military ! China is a threat !" morons.

China hasn't been a military threat for about 1200 years.

That's even older than thermite.
 
I dunno, you turn all those T-15's into midget subs, they'll swarm the West and East coasts and destroy us all! Even an Escalade loaded with gang members wouldn't be able to hold one of them off...
 
I dunno, you turn all those T-15's into midget subs, they'll swarm the West and East coasts and destroy us all! Even an Escalade loaded with gang members wouldn't be able to hold one of them off...

Why would China invade or "destroy" territory when they were able to get control cheaply by corruption and lies that roughly half the population was absolutely delighted to buy-into, voluntarily?

Their government is evil. Not stupid.

Their only real worry is that in the indiscriminate ripping-off of intellectual property they might accidentally steal the rights to self-destructive stupidity from our Dumbasscraptic Party.

If, then, they put that suicidal sickness into mass production within PRC?

Their Government is easily as doomed as ours is!
 
Well, it’s more an advanced design from the 1963 Type 62 if wanna be tight about it. And it’s a bridge, a platform between the Bradley and a MBT, ideal for their regions in Tibet/towards India. Defense Politic Asia called it an interesting development. Of course they got MBTs, 3rdGen to compete w
our 3rd Gen, and an unknown against ours - the Type 99, etc. maybe on-par, faster than Abrams, slightly bigger gun, has an auto loader, advanced electronics and nav system, anti-helo... can parse the us v them.

Giving them a helping hand and letting them steal created a greater threat yes to their civilians, and maybe one day Taiwan, than otherwise shoud’ve Happened.

Some of the manual machinery in the vid might have been ours, maybe German polish Chinese, but “some” of the know-how and electronics, ouch.

Just free-time four wheeling in KY’s mud about 30 years+ ago w my bud. To the cupola covered w wet and mud;)

The Chinese ought to be another 50 years behind us, but for. Yeah, any foreign tank development “advancement” if even retrograde-ish bothers me. Gotta wonder how much QUANTITY CAPACITY they got. Numbers certainly count. Would love for the educated to tell us the quality of anything in that factory. I believe one of Norinco’s.


The main problem w/r PRC AFV's vs USA?

Is called "the Pacific Ocean".

The problem with OTHER folks who ARE eyeball-to-eyeball with us "from time to time" and OPERATE Chicom, Sov, Ukrainian AFV's?

Is called "US Air power".

AFV's are far from obsolete. But still...

Hundred-dollar drones, advanced electronics, and precision fires from heavy artillery is what has been bleeding-out armored inventory, on both sides in the Donbas for "a while" already.

Even without air-power involvement any heavier than drones, they just don't GET TO tank-on-tank engagements.
 








 
Back
Top