What's new
What's new

Permission to show client's parts?

mhajicek

Diamond
Joined
May 11, 2017
Location
Maple Grove, MN, USA
I've seen a lot of shops with a display case of their clients parts in the front entry. Does anyone here have a standard form for getting formal permission to show their client's parts?

Thanks
 
We never did. Just don't identify who the part was for and what it does. Must of our customers were o.k. with it.
 
Why ask? you are bond to have a rejected part or 2 that you own, You dont need to tell everybody that the parts are junk, they look good and you own them, put them on display (bad side down)...Phil
 
So what do you do with scrap parts? The scrap guy is bound to see them, does he sign the NDA also?

I don't have a scrap guy. Most of my parts are smaller than an inch.


Splitting hairs but bad parts are not what you were paid to make and dont represent what you build for the cust....Phil

They still contain design features covered by the NDA. I don't want to find myself in court trying to convince a judge that it isn't the same thing because it's .0002" different.
 
If you are making parts covered by an NDA I wouldn't show them, or ask the customer if I could show them..since you have already said in writing that you won't show the parts to anyone.

Why not just play around with making useless parts that look cool for a display case during downtime?

At a place I worked at a long time ago a customer came in and said that they saw one of the plate drops for a part we made them for sale at a junk yard, and asked that we make sure to destroy them further before having our scrap guy haul them off. Some people are more concerned than others.
 
I don’t think we have a single customer that does not require that we sign an NDA or CDA. In some cases we are not even allowed to disclose that we do work for some customers. This can make it problematic when new potential customers ask for references.
 
The NDA's I sign state that I will not share any of the client's design information without prior written approval, hence the asking for written approval. I was just thinking I can't be the only person in this position, and someone must have a standard form for requesting written permission.
 
The NDA's I sign state that I will not share any of the client's design information without prior written approval, hence the asking for written approval. I was just thinking I can't be the only person in this position, and someone must have a standard form for requesting written permission.

I'm sure I have several. From ages ago. Left "Big Corp" to novate "small corp(s)" I carried-with on HDD a TON of forms that had begun in the 60's as binders of commonly needed stuff.

That stuff is still all over the 'net.

BUT....

End of the day, it will be THEIR forms and THEIR legal-eagles as must be kept happy.

So all the "requestor" needs is a decently worded common bizness letter ASKING and explaining why you ask, and what the exposure is planned to be.. to reduce their natural initial paranoia.

The Fujitsu deal? We wanted to hit the newspapers with the "win-win" brag as to how the Consultancy (my one..) had arranged a direct Fujitsu support role (the local distributor was a notorious Charlie-Fox) for a major, and significantly "visible" institution.

Folks at both sides have to assess several angles. They did. We published the article, SCMP, Hong Kong. All were pleased.

Funny part is.. no one TOLD us.. but Fujitsu was about to EXIT that whole line of bizness! And did, soon after!

Just ask.

Appropriate forms will be found or created from prior practice.

Small corp to small corp? NEITHER of you have those things, yet?

Just Google for it!
Books / media copies of DOZENS of standard forms should ALREADY be in the office.
If not so, make it so. They are cheap or even free.

No need to keep reinventing the same admin-language wheel any more that reinvent Bic Biros to sign it.

"Good idea" that someone take at least two SEMESTERS of basic Bizness Law so yah grok which to use and when, annnd what you can/should/must, or should NOT or must NOT ... change to fit the needs.

Night courses are better than days. Always.

You'll be with OTHER mature folks who have real-world experience and real-world needs, not juvenile delinquent air-head teeny-boppers.

Your instructor will likely be a moonlighting real-world bizness person with a Day Job. Not a prof who has NEVER worked a real-world job.

Helps yah know WHEN yah need a lawster.

Helps make the "when" a lot less OFTEN by steering yah away from danger before a screw-up rather than after, too.

Bizness longevity?

Ever-and-always has been more about NOT stepping on the equivalent of a deadly landmine than about being super-brilliant.. and then.. stepping on a legal landmine!
 
The NDA's I sign state that I will not share any of the client's design information without prior written approval, hence the asking for written approval. I was just thinking I can't be the only person in this position, and someone must have a standard form for requesting written permission.

I think that a documented email chain asking/recieving permission and showing a picture of the part you intend to display would satisfy that.
 
I think that a documented email chain asking/recieving permission and showing a picture of the part you intend to display would satisfy that.

LOL!

So long as you had prior permission on-file to attach a picture of THEIR part ... to.. an email?

Good job most Lawsters are well aware they are not machinists.. nor any of several thousand OTHER specialties and generalities.

Pity the reverse - ever' body thinking themselves a legal expert when they are not even giving things much thought at all - isn't more widely understood.
 
LOL!

So long as you had prior permission on-file to attach a picture of THEIR part ... to.. an email?

Good job most Lawsters are well aware they are not machinists.. nor any of several thousand OTHER specialties and generalities.

Pity the reverse - ever' body thinking themselves a legal expert when they are not even giving things much thought at all - isn't more widely understood.

True. Though if the language of the agreement just wants "written approval" I still think that would be sufficient, but correctly pointed out I am no legal expert. Picture maybe not needed anyway, but was just thinking I would want to be very explicit about exactly what I intended to display if I was asking. (and I am assuming that communication is already by email with the customer, and not armed escort under the cover of night)

Likewise though you could have something iron clad in writing and reviewed by lawyers, and if anyone with the money to do so wants to give you legal problems they still will regardless.

Like my first post said if it was me I would just put something else up not under someone's NDA in the first place.
 
(and I am assuming that communication is already by email with the customer, and not armed escort under the cover of night)

It isn't THAT many years ago I ceased running my corporate servers for secure transfers. One server had but a tiny handful of users. The four Directors of (my) Conducive Group (Asia), Ltd. And the retired Chairman, A.S. Watsons.

:)

SMTP email isn't "inherently" secure. At all.
It must be MADE so.

Gmail, widely used?

Google makes no secret that it "data-mines" the CONTENT of its message traffic body text.

Go figure its end-lusers don't seem to care.

Published newspaper articles estimate 70% of all email traffic on planet Earth traverses points just a few miles from my house. Not because Loudoun County, Virginia is the geographic center of the universe. Because some agency wants the cheap convenience. No Such Agency gets exactly what it wants. So it HAS exactly what it wants!
 








 
Back
Top